[edge919]

james, you miss the point. The defendant has a burden of proof that exists outside of the lawsuit. All the plaintiff has to prove is that Obama never met that original burden of proof.

[jamese777]

james, you miss the point. The defendant has a burden of proof that exists outside of the lawsuit. All the plaintiff has to prove is that Obama never met that original burden of proof.

---

Last time I looked Barack Hussein Obama II was the 44th President of the United States. No Court of Law and no act of Congress has ruled any differently.

Scores of plaintiffs have failed in their attempts to “prove that Obama never met that original burden of proof.”

Those who don’t believe that he has met the burden of proof on constitutional eligibility have the option of voting against him on the first Tuesday in November, 2012.