Earlier I mentioned the 1960’s Civil Right’s JUDICIAL remedies of forced busing and affirmative action. Where from did those Judicial powers arise?
Is Obama holding office today, only because of those who call themselves “conservative” judges are loathe to engage in the kind of bold remedies that “liberal” judges impose and inject into the legal system? Obama arose due to affirmative action — his absence of scholarship, while being Law Review at Harvard testifies to that, in addition to other doors that opened for him with no effort on his behalf — and by affirmative inaction he remains today a despotic usurper in office.
Another way to look at it is that Obama campaigned for a year and a half to win his party’s nomination in primary elections. He won primaries in 35 states and territories plus he won a number of state caucuses as well.
Then he raised three-quarters of a billion dollars in campaign funds. He competed for four months against his Republican opponent and managed to accumulate 69,456,987 popular votes and 365 Electoral College votes.
Then he had his Electoral College votes counted and certified by Vice President Dick Cheney serving as President of the Senate at a Joint Session of Congress and not one Representative or Senator out of 535 members of Congress submitted a written objection to the certification of the Electoral College vote.
He was then sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts and there have been 91 adjudicated attempts to challenge his eligibility in courts all across the nation including 13 attempts at the Supreme Court and the eligibility scoreboard is Challengers: 0/Obama: 91.
Congress has initiated no hearings on his eligibility and no impeachment hearings have even been suggested.
That’s a slightly different way to look at it.
For that amazing accomplishment, and it was indeed, he was awarded a Nobel Prize. Although most view that prize as given so as to slapdown the traditional heritage, history and establishment US. Obama was clearly -- to all the world -- nearly absent of the ideals and legacy of our heritage. That's what "Change" meant: radical throwing off of the old US -- and the whole world knew it!
But you now have provided an equally AWESOME statistic.
In a string of 91 court rulings NOT ONE HAS HEARD ANY FACTS OR TESTIMONY AS TO THE CLAIM IN DISPUTE.
Try tossing a coin 91 times and coming up "HEADS" every time. The odds are 1 in 2.5 times 10 to the 27th power. That means IMPOSSIBLE. But it happened. Yes, indeed. It happened.
I'm not a superstitious person. I'm not looking for an anti-Christ, or even a Messiah. The later would be nice, but I'm not wasting time looking or waiting.
But since Obama spoke to that Democratic Convention some years ago, a series of extraordinarily unlikely events have occurred. The odds are way too long, of his being where he is, and of no one challenging his grand con even a bit successfully, even as it is almost beyond denial that there many legitimate challenges to his legitimacy. As you said, in effect: his coin came up heads 91 times in a row.
Who knows? If someone wanted to believe in an anti-Christ there's certainly a lot of extraordinary circumstances of an anti-Christ sort in the Obama narrative.
Maybe we should nickname him "Damian".