Replies

Obama won the election. In fact, during the election he claimed, during a debate, that the management of the election as his managerial experience. It was, in fact, his single success against the odds. In all his other endeavors he seems to have either (1) failed, (2) been carried by others, (3) received special “insider” treatment to gain entry or office, (4) propelled by affirmative action, (5) achieved by smooth presentation or (6) hidden the results.
For that amazing accomplishment, and it was indeed, he was awarded a Nobel Prize. Although most view that prize as given so as to slapdown the traditional heritage, history and establishment US. Obama was clearly — to all the world — nearly absent of the ideals and legacy of our heritage. That’s what “Change” meant: radical throwing off of the old US — and the whole world knew it!

But you now have provided an equally AWESOME statistic.

In a string of 91 court rulings NOT ONE HAS HEARD ANY FACTS OR TESTIMONY AS TO THE CLAIM IN DISPUTE.

Try tossing a coin 91 times and coming up “HEADS” every time. The odds are 1 in 2.5 times 10 to the 27th power. That means IMPOSSIBLE. But it happened. Yes, indeed. It happened.

I’m not a superstitious person. I’m not looking for an anti-Christ, or even a Messiah. The later would be nice, but I’m not wasting time looking or waiting.

But since Obama spoke to that Democratic Convention some years ago, a series of extraordinarily unlikely events have occurred. The odds are way too long, of his being where he is, and of no one challenging his grand con even a bit successfully, even as it is almost beyond denial that there many legitimate challenges to his legitimacy. As you said, in effect: his coin came up heads 91 times in a row.

Who knows? If someone wanted to believe in an anti-Christ there’s certainly a lot of extraordinary circumstances of an anti-Christ sort in the Obama narrative.

Maybe we should nickname him “Damian”.

From the first Obama eligibility lawsuit to be adjudicated, Berg v Obama, the word that comes up most often in Judges’ decisions is “frivolous.”
Frivolous lawsuits get tossed. Orly Taitz was fined $20,000 for filing a frivolous lawsuit. The Supreme Court upheld her sanction.
Other birther attorneys have had to show cause and pay court costs for filing frivolous lawsuits that waste a Court’s time with nonsense.

As Governor Sarah Palin has said, issues of Obama’s eligibility are “distracting” and “annoying.” Judges agree with the former Governor.

If you want a serious discussion of Obama’s eligibility to be President, get Congress to hold hearings and/or find a prosecuting attorney willing to conduct a grand jury investigation.

Hue and cry.

In 1857 the courts did not hear it. It was frivolous for a black slave to presume to bring a court case. It was a distraction, a nuisance, they were after all, sub-human. A man did bring a Grand Jury of sorts, it being an active Jury. He brought it to Harper’s Ferry, Virginia in 1859. By April less than two years later, the Civil War broke out. Less than two years.

Now Obama’s case is not like that. No such insurrection will arise from not hearing it. But the danger of not hearing that hue and cry is as great. For if Obama is not removed from office the nation may not survive, as a Republic, until the new President arrives in late January 2013. Obama has shown how dangerous he can be, but he has not yet completed his demonstration.

Do you imagine a civil war will be avoided here?

Obama’s allies call for it. Have you been deaf or blind to the reports of their words?

Obama in his thug-king’s passive-aggressive verbal framing has called for it too.