Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: MinorityRepublican
Is the airport open there and people flying out to the USA asking for Asylum?
2 posted on
03/07/2011 11:59:46 AM PST by
artificial intelligence
(Your data will be processed by me for future input. Thank you.)
To: MinorityRepublican
That should scare the hell out of them....
To: MinorityRepublican
How incredibly decisive...
4 posted on
03/07/2011 12:00:16 PM PST by
Christian Engineer Mass
(25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
To: MinorityRepublican
I imagine they are talking E-3 AWACS and E-2 Hawkeyes. Maybe Joint STARS too?
To: MinorityRepublican
somebody must have told Obama that high gas rices will cost him reelection.
6 posted on
03/07/2011 12:06:43 PM PST by
RC one
(CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN! YES WE CAN! FUBO!)
To: MinorityRepublican; DarthVader
which article in the NATO charter would authorize this ?
9 posted on
03/07/2011 12:15:40 PM PST by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: MinorityRepublican
If this were the Bush administration it would be safe to assume this “announcement” was cleared with the allies whose air crews are flying the missions. But with this gang? I would not be surprised if the surveillance was (formerly) secret and the “ambASSador” just put those crews at risk. Among Qaddafi’s many toys are some nice modern SA missiles.
10 posted on
03/07/2011 12:20:07 PM PST by
katana
To: MinorityRepublican
Setting up one of our guys to be shot down as a causus belli?
12 posted on
03/07/2011 12:28:52 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: MinorityRepublican
We have a NATO Ambassador?
When did NATO become a country?
14 posted on
03/07/2011 12:30:31 PM PST by
hattend
(Obama got his 3am call about Egypt. The call went right to the answering machine.- Sarah Palin)
To: MinorityRepublican
I'd like to wager that the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive, undeclared war that was so mercilessly decried by the waning media and the tyrant/socialist axis in the UN will now be referred to as the Obama Doctrine, and will be praised to the heavens as both wise and necessary. And bombing Libya will ironically result in Soetoro's second Nobel Peace Prize, because war is peace.
If I were prone to fear, these times would terrify me.
As it is, I'm just amused to dangerous levels.
15 posted on
03/07/2011 12:31:27 PM PST by
Dr. Sheldon Cooper
(The truth can indeed be a finger-down-the-throat for those unprepared to hear it.)
To: MinorityRepublican
Has anyone else noticed that Obama's staff is/are getting as snotty as he is?
This quote from the article by Jay Carney:
Carney downplayed speculation about the possibility of providing arms to the Libyan rebels, telling reporters that "it would be premature to send a bunch of weapons to a post office box in eastern Libya."
And this comment from Bill Daley yesterday:
"Lots of people throw around phrases of 'no-fly zone' and they talk about it as though it's just a game, a video game or something. Some people who throw that line out have no idea what they're talking about," Daley said, without indicating whom he meant.
These guys sound downright b!tchy.
To: MinorityRepublican
STAY OUT OF LIBYA!
18 posted on
03/07/2011 12:53:19 PM PST by
americanophile
("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives"-Ataturk)
To: MinorityRepublican
then NATO is going to write a VERY stern letter.
19 posted on
03/07/2011 12:56:17 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: MinorityRepublican
so Kha-Daffy knows that he is being watched closely while he is wiping out thousands of his own people
To: MinorityRepublican
And all this time I thought NATO stood for North Atlantic Treaty Organization. How stupid of me!
26 posted on
03/07/2011 1:34:57 PM PST by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: MinorityRepublican
Are we so sure who is our ‘frienemy’?
Rumor is that AlQueda is in the east.
36 posted on
03/07/2011 2:50:09 PM PST by
griswold3
(The wolves are howling)
To: MinorityRepublican
Is there anyone else who is worried at how the Muslim Brotherhood is behind all this unrest, and the Muslim Brotherhood is who is behind all the terrorist acts against Israel and the US and NOW we are going to bomb Libya to support a MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD terrorist action??
37 posted on
03/07/2011 3:38:07 PM PST by
RaceBannon
(RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
To: MinorityRepublican
If NATO is not going to blow them out of the sky on sight, I fail to see the point of putting the NATO troops in harms way.
As with anything military I believe in an overwhelming response. Go full bore or go home. In this case I would prefer the Go Home option.
39 posted on
03/07/2011 6:14:28 PM PST by
Drill Thrawl
(I don't prep for the disaster. I prepare for the rebuilding.)
To: MinorityRepublican
Funny you don't hear the whiney marxists/liberals/socialists screaming...
NO WAR FOR OIL!
41 posted on
03/07/2011 7:59:27 PM PST by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: MinorityRepublican
But it’s a secret so SHHHHHH......
48 posted on
03/08/2011 5:13:13 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson