NPR chief asks critics: What liberal bias?

The Hill ^

[lentulusgracchus]

(Art.) Schiller said the accusation that public broadcasting has a liberal bias is just a "perception problem" that doesn't accurately reflect NPR's journalism.

Oh, really? Then to what do we owe the long series of PBS/American Experience paeans to Communist agitators and their NGO's and New Deal sugar-teats? To sentimental, even slobbery retrospectives about Jewish co-op Communists in New York, Communist photogs working New Deal alphabet-soup agency grifts doing agitprop photography, Communist screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, and on and on and on?

[lentulusgracchus]

I vivdly remember Alan Colmes saying that Clinton would have to resign just for having an affair in the Oval Office, never mind the perjury. A few days later he was singing a different tune. Not that I was surprised.

There was a good piece of conservative journalism out there somewhere that I saw 10 years ago, about how Clinton and Dick Morris polled, immediately after the Paula Jones story broke, to find out how much damage Slick could take before he'd have to resign.

Morris's returns indicated that if Starr and/or the House impeachment managers could show actual perjury by a sitting President, Clinton would have to resign. The Clintons immediately set about lowering public standards and expectations -- corrupting the public to lower the bar.

They succeeded, as history shows, by floating the "it's only sex/all MEN lie about sex" canard.

Feminism is still suppurating and bleeding from the damage their movement took in that scandal, though, as they were clearly, publicly supporting "abuser" (rapist) Clinton throughout. Their cred has never recovered. (And doesn't deserve to.)

Morris can do all the call-ins he wants to conservative radio shows, but I'll never, ever forgive him for the damage he helped the Clintons do to our body politic.