“Unfortunately he offered no arguments to respond to my questions about Aldrich Ames and neither did you.”
You labeled it “Extremely Suspicious”. Why would you use a term like that? It’s like you KNOW the poster is guilty of something - or at least he APPEARS to be, and sometimes it’s the appearance of impropriety that is important, isn’t it?
You don’t remember your previous totally unsubstantiated accusations of antisemitism levied at me over the same topic. And why would you? You were in rare form.
You are a race-baiter. Your defense of Pollard boils down to nuances (to you) of how he is treated compared to non-Jew spies, and ultimately your defense is a thin gruel of “you hate Jews....unless you want Pollard released”
Jesse Jackson has nothing over you. It won’t work.
Frankly, I find your defense of Pollard “extremely suspicious”.
You’ve been practicing that speech for a long time, haven’t you? :)
I’ll let you have the last word.