Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stosh
I’m generally against tapping the strategic reserve, but if it’s temporary, sporadic, and would be replenished, I could go with it.

The strategic reserve is for strategic purposes; like war. Planes, tanks and ships don't run well on ethenol.

33 posted on 03/09/2011 11:47:08 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Cobra64

You’re right, you’re right, you’re right.

I have some sympathy that random, very limited withdrawals from the reserve might work to break the cycle of rising oil prices (since speculation generally operates out of a pack psychology), but your fundamental point is unarguable - at some point the Straights of Hormuz are going to explode, and at that point whatever we’ve got in the strategic reserve is going to be too little.


39 posted on 03/09/2011 3:50:10 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson