Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strk321
What I was saying is that we were better off using throwaway spacecraft as they did. Much cheaper and safer.

The shuttle had a lot of capability. It's the only thing that's been able to put up a crew along with a heavy payload. To match it Russian style, you'd need a heavy lifter and several rendevous with crews, but then there would still be no shuttle bay. Manned space flight is dead without the shuttle, well, except for the ISS, I guess. We'll see how long that lasts.

18 posted on 03/09/2011 10:28:38 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: dr_lew

True, but the big problem the shuttles had was the lack of a launch abort system, which doomed the Challenger crew.

That would not have saved the Columbia crew of course, but then the four Russians lost in flight were also killed as a result of reentry accidents.

And let’s not forget that the Russians tried to build their own shuttle once, but ran out of money and gave up on the project.


21 posted on 03/09/2011 10:35:38 PM PST by Strk321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson