Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NPR Board Member Admits It Serves 'Liberal, Highly Educated Elite,' Wonders How to.....
Newsbusters ^

Posted on 03/11/2011 12:18:23 PM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: liberalh8ter
Not so stupid I won't donate to James O'Keefe's website to thank him for the exposé.....Project Veritas...NOT NPR.
21 posted on 03/11/2011 12:58:23 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Imagine if their target audience had instead been “highly educated, conservative, traditional American families”. They would have nurtured five times the audience they have now. Instead, they went after an audience of America-hating, masturbating, liberal “intellectuals” like themselves. NPR screwed up, big time. So sad, too bad...

Always so easy to put the blame on others, isn't it? Never the fault of conservatives who never see the train until it hits them.

Leaving aside the whole government funding thing, it was a resource that conservatives could have developed and used to great effect: think of Buckley's old Firing Line TV show, which was excellent and widely watched -- it's no accident that the intellectual respectability of conservatism reached its pinnacle at the same time that show was on PBS. People could actually hear the arguments for conservatism for themselves, and see them tested in actual debate.

Defund it immediately.

Defund it, sure ... but what is now NPR, will stick around in some form because the 11% audience has big money and likes it enough to pony up the cash in one way or another. Lots of big foundations would keep it going.

22 posted on 03/11/2011 12:59:44 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tioga
You're in good company with your opinion: To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical. ~ Thomas Jefferson
23 posted on 03/11/2011 1:01:26 PM PST by Spartan79 ("We are not to expect to be translated from despotism to liberty in a feather-bed." ~ Ths. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tioga

I hear ya! it’s money VERY well spent.


24 posted on 03/11/2011 1:04:00 PM PST by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; sickoflibs; Liz; pissant; DakotaRed; Cobra64; BenKenobi; cripplecreek; Tublecane; ...
(NPR): "we unwittingly cultivated a core audience that is predominately white, liberal, highly educated, elite."

Yep, all those folks struggling to pay the mortgage, get braces for the kids and go to a movie once a month must be happy seeing these people get their tax dollars...

25 posted on 03/11/2011 1:06:44 PM PST by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

wonder if someone could post a mother pig (government) with the little sucklings NPR PBS on the teats of government. keep in the little piggies have some fancy dresses on and have whatever uppity purse the “elites” think is the latest thing.

The elites want PBS and NPR - pay for it themselves. There is no governmental funding for Conservative Radio - advertisers pay for the AM Stations to exist.


26 posted on 03/11/2011 1:20:10 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Its an almost perfect, ‘tax the poor to feed the rich’ scam.


27 posted on 03/11/2011 1:21:09 PM PST by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Liberal, Who Believe They are Highly Educated Elite,”


28 posted on 03/11/2011 1:32:34 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"we unwittingly cultivated a core audience that is predominately white, liberal, highly educated, elite."

Unwittingly?

I thought these people were smart.

29 posted on 03/11/2011 1:50:01 PM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k omalley
I have donated to NPR because I like their classical music.

Get Sirius.

No commercials or fundraisers.

30 posted on 03/11/2011 1:53:45 PM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So let the elites support it.


31 posted on 03/11/2011 2:18:18 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Individuals whose intention at every step is to contribute to the greater good.

The path to 100,000,000 murders last century was paved with identical intentions, comrade.

32 posted on 03/11/2011 2:22:46 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Defund it, sure ... but what is now NPR, will stick around in some form because the 11% audience has big money and likes it enough to pony up the cash in one way or another. Lots of big foundations would keep it going.

That's wonderful. I wish them well (relatively.)

Unlike leftists, I have zero interest in silencing opposing viewpoints. I only object to being forced to fund them.

I agree that conservatives need a more intellectual forum than talk radio and the theater on FoxNews. Mark Steyn could probably pull something together that discussed music, politics, events, etc. with a conservative bent.

The problem would be ratings, just like it is for liberals. There's no money-making market for deep thoughts on either side of the aisle.

People like sex and explosions.

33 posted on 03/11/2011 2:31:22 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“we unwittingly cultivated a core audience that is predominately white, liberal, highly educated, elite.”

What!?!? Responsible, Common Sense, Hard Working not part of the description of their audience? I’m shocked! I’ve been duped! Damn that Bush! /s


34 posted on 03/11/2011 2:39:22 PM PST by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
The problem would be ratings, just like it is for liberals. There's no money-making market for deep thoughts on either side of the aisle.

Well, yes and no. According to Wiki, most of their funding does not come from the federal government.

Depending on how you want to look at it, about 12% overall of NPR's budget comes in the form of federal grants, to member stations and NPR itself. About 15% comes from universities, and the rest comes from pledge drives and corporate donations.

IOW, most of their money comes from subscribers and donors: clearly it is capable of surviving on its own. Loss of federal dollars may slighly reduce NPR's scope, but it will still have most of its financial base.

Conservatives could build a similar base ... or, they could push their way into the existing NPR structure. But I think conservatives are too politically stupid to do either. The evidence suggests that we tend to ignore the effects of liberal politics until they bite us in the ass.

35 posted on 03/11/2011 2:42:47 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 240B
Its an almost perfect, ‘tax the poor to feed the rich’ scam.

It's the same trick elites use to fund Arts Museums ( i.e. private clubs for the liberal wives of wealthy men) - on taxpayer dimes - and yeah, they do good, but it's mostly 'good' for other rich educated liberal elites.

I'm surprised the NPR woman was so upfront about it...

36 posted on 03/11/2011 2:43:19 PM PST by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Defund it, sure ... but what is now NPR, will stick around in some form because the 11% audience has big money and likes it enough to pony up the cash in one way or another. Lots of big foundations would keep it going.

Fine by me - - at least taxpayers would not be forced to participate in the NPR circle jerk.

Anyway, it's not a zero-sum calculation. Whatever money the liberal elitist NPR audience and those "big foundations" dump down the NPR toilet is less money they will have for dumping into Democrat campaign coffers. Win-win for decent Americans.

37 posted on 03/11/2011 3:00:35 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
More than that, I have seen cities levy a ‘tax’ to build a stadium with reserved ‘private’ box seats.

That is, they would levy the whole city to pay to build some politician or CEO or whatever a box seat. Crazy.

If I can't go in there like anyone else and watch the game, then it is NOT PUBLIC. I'm not going to pay for it. Screw that!

It is the typical pattern. But, I think the Liberals have finally overreached by forcing Obama on us. Now the walls are tumbling down from all sides and they cannot believe or accept it. This is just not the way ‘their world’ is supposed to work. Stupid peasants!

Just like almost all tyrants, they forgot...they just stopped even a pretense of hiding their greed and contempt for the masses. Any chapter in any history book (a book written several year ago before history itself got confiscated) will dictate the same cycle.

38 posted on 03/11/2011 3:08:45 PM PST by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

“Individuals whose intention at every step is to contribute to the greater good. Ours is a human endeavor.”

I’m from NPR and I intend to help you is almost as scary as “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you”


39 posted on 03/11/2011 3:18:39 PM PST by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 240B
The part of the ‘stadium scam’ most offensive to me is the part where taxpayers pay for 99% of the stadium - and some liberal elite bigwig comes in - hands over a measly 1% in a big showy check - and gets to name the stadium...and get his picture in the paper.
40 posted on 03/11/2011 3:19:13 PM PST by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson