Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Supreme Court Sided With Westboro Baptist
Townhall.com ^ | March 13, 2011 | Ken Connor

Posted on 03/13/2011 7:46:27 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Carley

“When someone speaking before the Supremes can call them fags and hope they rot in hell will be the day I support their decision.

You can’t use that language on TV, in any classroom in America either.”

I suspect that the Supremes have been called worse than that. Maybe not someone actually petitioning them and hoping for a decision to go their way, but still.

That language IS used on TV pretty regularly. This 2 1/2 men show, just for an example, that is in the news right now used that sort of language and worse.

And, thirdly, having taught school, I can assure you that this type of language does occur. Hopefully not by the teacher, but it does happen.

This is a very emotion-laden issue, and the westboro group make it very, very hard to support anything that would assist them in any way, but it should not be judged on the basis of emotion and desire, but upon the principles stated in the Constitution.


61 posted on 03/13/2011 2:51:51 PM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Evidently community standards means dwelling in the sewer.

America has come a long long way, sadly sadly.


62 posted on 03/13/2011 3:28:48 PM PDT by Carley (WISCONSIN STREET NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Carley

Whether or not that is true, and it demonstrably is in certain areas, it is not the question. The question is, and always does come down to “does the Constitution give the government to authority to determine what is and isn’t acceptable speech”.


63 posted on 03/13/2011 3:38:01 PM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur
standing on the sidewalk constitutes “getting in someone’s face”.

Yeah, well that sidewalk was at the gates of Walter Reed Army Medical Center! Perhaps you are not familiar with what WRAMC is. I am. I was there. I am the one that called those bikers in to help us counter that slime. I watched as it took 6 of our wounded warriors to hold back one that was losing it seeing them there.

They don't just stand there. They marched up and down the street in front of the hospital chanting vile things, as they ground the flag into the ground with their feet while others blew their nose on another flag.

Look at the signs very carefully. One in particular should not be displayed in a neighborhood where children live. These vile pukes should not be given any attention, but instead they are invited onto all the news shows...yes including FOX.

In retrospect we should have formed a human wall around those pukes at Arlington National Cememtary on Memorial Day 2006 when a Marine could not withstand the temptation and lunged for them. I would have laid odds on the Marine coming out alive. We could not get across the street fast enough to do so, but a bunch of other Marines were there before the police showed up. We like to think our chanting "LET THE MARINE GO!" repeatedly had a little something to do with him walking away.

BTW, this family cult has no connection to any Baptist organization. I find it amazing we are constantly reading about hate speech charges and the like, but these hatemongers are perfectly acceptable. Disgusting!

64 posted on 03/13/2011 3:50:21 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
The Tea Party should organize HUGE groups everywhere WBC goes to protest.

The DC Chapter of FreeRepublic, Rolling Thunder, Patriot Guard Riders and patriots all across this nation have been doing just that since the scum started their nonsense.

See post #64.

65 posted on 03/13/2011 3:54:55 PM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
They don't just stand there. They marched up and down the street in front of the hospital chanting vile things, as they ground the flag into the ground with their feet while others blew their nose on another flag.

All of these actions, revolting as they are, constitute protected speech as per the Supreme Court.

Look at the signs very carefully. One in particular should not be displayed in a neighborhood where children live.

All of the signs have vile messages...which one are you speaking of in particular?

These vile pukes should not be given any attention, but instead they are invited onto all the news shows...yes including FOX.

I agree completely, and were I in control of a network they would not appear on it.

BTW, this family cult has no connection to any Baptist organization.

That is my understanding as well.

I find it amazing we are constantly reading about hate speech charges and the like, but these hatemongers are perfectly acceptable.

Please bear in mind that tolerance and acceptance are two quite different things. Also, hate speech is not illegal in the Unites States (thankfully).

Disgusting!

Agreed.

66 posted on 03/13/2011 4:06:19 PM PDT by Abin Sur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

And we have the wise latina whining that some of the questions she was asked during confirmation were ‘insensitive’. She was offended.

Well, excuse me. Something is very wrong here.


67 posted on 03/13/2011 4:17:31 PM PDT by Carley (WISCONSIN STREET NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

I do not think that all of the Justices are right or wrong all of the time.


68 posted on 03/13/2011 4:22:29 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Oligarchy...never vote for the Ivy League candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
But I don't see how FReepers would have wanted this case to be decided otherwise.

Because you don't picket funerals. Period. I'm comfortable with that being the new "don't yell FIRE in a theater."

69 posted on 03/13/2011 8:14:39 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
Wow!

Those quotes are from the mind of a seriously twisted person.

Maybe someone with the time and resources can visit the family of these sick protesters and give them a taste of their own medicine.

70 posted on 03/14/2011 6:59:27 AM PDT by airborne (Powerful public unions and fiscal calamity. (Notice how those go hand in hand?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: houeto
I'd call it inciting a riot.

The question of whether the behavior constitutes inciting a riot should properly be examined by a jury. The Supreme Court tends sometimes to issue rulings which effectively make factual declarations on issues which have not been examined in detail in trial court. The Supreme Court should have issued a decision explaining what would have to be shown in order for the protests to be denied protection, rather than making a determination of whether they should be protected.

71 posted on 03/15/2011 4:04:49 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PENANCE

‘Brutus’ was one sharp man; much of what he has warned of has come to pass.


72 posted on 03/15/2011 10:46:29 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Looks like “fightin’ words” to me... someone ought to take them up on their offer.


73 posted on 03/15/2011 10:52:59 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson