Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy

No, she didn’t. And she clarified for those who misread what she first said.

Thankfully, and unlike the majority of FReepers on this thread, the Supreme Court doesn’t operate on emotionalism.


27 posted on 03/13/2011 9:20:02 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts

>>Thankfully, and unlike the majority of FReepers on this thread, the Supreme Court doesn’t operate on emotionalism.<<

I agree.


59 posted on 03/13/2011 1:38:01 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: B Knotts

>>”Common sense & decency absent as wacko ‘church’ allowed hate msgs spewed@ soldiers’ funerals but we can’t invoke God’s name in public square,” Palin tweeted . <<

Bad form.

It’s one of those things that needs to be “clarified” later. It was an emotional response while many of us here were discussing the legal merits of the case and why the SCOTUS was correct.


60 posted on 03/13/2011 1:40:32 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson