Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric
Situations like this should be resolved through some other legitimate means instead of narrowing the legal definition of the 1st Amendment.

I'd call it inciting a riot.

34 posted on 03/13/2011 9:34:45 AM PDT by houeto (Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: houeto
I'd call it inciting a riot.

The question of whether the behavior constitutes inciting a riot should properly be examined by a jury. The Supreme Court tends sometimes to issue rulings which effectively make factual declarations on issues which have not been examined in detail in trial court. The Supreme Court should have issued a decision explaining what would have to be shown in order for the protests to be denied protection, rather than making a determination of whether they should be protected.

71 posted on 03/15/2011 4:04:49 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson