Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dynoman

“There’s got to be more to this, I can’t see how basically metal fuel rods burn, and if they did how they could be extinguished so easily. They would most likely melt and end up like the elephant’s foot under Chernobyl.”

Let’s just say that this is an example of “just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it cannot happen”. Some metals, like depleted uranium, will spontaneously combust when they are sufficiently finely divided, eg; powdered. That’s in air. If the temps are high enough at the point where these metals are exposed, including the zirconium cladding, water can dissasociate into hydrogen & oxygen, just as with electrolysis. That’s a potent explosive mixture right there. But in any event the process supplies free oxygen. And generally speaking, almost anything that can oxidize can, under the right conditions, oxidize fast enough to catch fire or catch fire to what’s next to it.


14 posted on 03/15/2011 4:46:42 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Which has more wrinkles? Helen Thomas' face or Lawrence O'Donnells' panties?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“Let’s just say that this is an example of “just because you can’t see it doesn’t mean it cannot happen”. “

The same holds true for secondary source extrapolation, just because some don’t think secondary sources like the MSM aren’t exaggerating doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Seems pretty clear there have been exaggerations, and probably with the secondary source report of fuel rods “burning”.


22 posted on 03/15/2011 5:46:25 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson