Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PICTURES: Airbus Military completes first A330 tanker flight for Saudi Arabia
Flight International ^ | 16/03/11 | Craig Hoyle

Posted on 03/16/2011 9:05:57 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

PICTURES: Airbus Military completes first A330 tanker flight for Saudi Arabia

By Craig Hoyle

Saudi Arabia's first A330 multi-role tanker transport (MRTT) has made its first flight in modified form, touching down on 15 March at the end of a 4h 15min sortie.

Conducted from Airbus Military's Getafe site near Madrid, the debut comes ahead of the company's planned delivery of the Royal Saudi Air Force's first of six aircraft late this year.

© Airbus Military

"The crew reported that the aircraft, its systems and two General Electric CF6 engines performed entirely satisfactorily," says Airbus Military. The company has previously flown modified A330 MRTT aircraft for Australia (three) and the UK (two), and is also modifying its first unit for the United Arab Emirates.

Now equipped with underwing hose and drogue refuelling pods and an advanced refuelling boom system, the aircraft was modified by Iberia Maintenance engineers and technicians. The conversion work totalled some 140,000 man hours over a period of 16 months, the company says.

“It is a great satisfaction for us to have successfully completed a project which is certainly the biggest challenge we have ever faced in the transformation of aircraft,” says José Luis Ruiz de Castañeda, Iberia’s executive vice-president maintenance and engineering

(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; eads; saudiarabia; tanker

1 posted on 03/16/2011 9:06:09 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The robe is missing! Whip the infidel!


2 posted on 03/16/2011 9:08:10 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
They ever figure out what caused the RAAF A330-MRTT's boom to fall off into the sea?
3 posted on 03/16/2011 9:14:59 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wonder if Boeing will deliver ours before 2020?


4 posted on 03/16/2011 9:15:12 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
And if it's still flying 60 years from now, airbus will have matched Boeing's mid-20th century abilities.

I am impressed the tail and boom stayed on for the whole flight.

5 posted on 03/16/2011 9:16:06 AM PDT by LIBERTARIAN JOE (Don't blame me - I voted for Ron Paul!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The wings should be higher up. Duh.


6 posted on 03/16/2011 9:24:18 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I have a question.

Why does Saudi Arabia need in-air refueling capabilities?


7 posted on 03/16/2011 9:36:12 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

I thought the same thing.


8 posted on 03/16/2011 9:58:51 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
They don't.

The US (Boeing) is not allowed to market tankers to the Kingdom precisely because it will destabilize the region and not benefit US national security in the region.

However, the French have no limitation.

9 posted on 03/16/2011 9:59:25 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

bttt


10 posted on 03/16/2011 10:51:16 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
Why does Saudi Arabia need in-air refueling capabilities?

FOr the same reason we need tanker support for our aircraft in the gulf region.

Sustained combat air patrols...

11 posted on 03/16/2011 10:55:35 AM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour (With The Resistance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

And they need to mount sustained CAP for what reason again?

As I see it, this is a sign of one of two things:

1. They want to buy nice toys. OK, I get that. I’m a guy too, and I like expensive, noisy toys.

2. They don’t think the US is a trustworthy partner, and they feel a need to develop a military capability to project force in the region without the US.


12 posted on 03/16/2011 11:00:05 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

If the US is not allowed to market tankers out there, how come the Saudis operate tanker variants of the C-130 and E-3??

And both these links says the Saudis selected the Airbus tanker over the Boeing offering.

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/01/03/220605/saudi-arabia-picks-eads-to-supply-three-airbus-a330-based-tankers.html

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jun2007/gb20070618_692470.htm


13 posted on 03/16/2011 11:08:26 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

The Saudis still need the US-they are negotiating for a massive arms deal including scores of fighters, helicopters and possibly warships. The tanker deal was given to Airbus since it offered a newer plane capable of offloading more fuel compared to Boeing’s earlier KC-767 model.


14 posted on 03/16/2011 11:11:09 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hulka; NVDave
Why does Saudi Arabia need in-air refueling capabilities?

7 posted on 03/17/2011 03:06:12 by NVDave

They don't.

The US (Boeing) is not allowed to market tankers to the Kingdom precisely because it will destabilize the region and not benefit US national security in the region.

My lying eyes done deceive me again. I hate it when that happens.


15 posted on 03/16/2011 4:37:25 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (I disagree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it -Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
My lying eyes says that "photo" is from a flight simulator program.

However, this photo is real:


16 posted on 03/16/2011 8:24:53 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Serious answer — because US fighter-bomber jets are designed to take off with maximum bomb load and a light fuel load, then add fuel in flight. The Saudis fly F-15s and need to have some extra fuel when the bomb the rebels in Bahrain.


17 posted on 03/16/2011 8:28:45 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

Bahrain shares a border with Saudi Arabia and is probably just bigger than Saudi Arabia’s biggest cities. You don’t need aerial refuellers to bomb a place like that. Even Israel is within range of their bombers based at Tabuk.

The F-15S and European Tornado aircraft have good range as it for these targets. The tankers were mainly purchased with Iran in mind which explains why the first ones were purchased from Boeing in the early 80s.


18 posted on 03/16/2011 8:46:05 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson