Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark
The point is that, once you start getting into the details of which categories should be exempt, the same thorny issues arise, and you are end up with something unwieldy if you consider them or something unwise or unfair if you don't.

Agreed. I don't believe there will be a solution that is completely fair, aside from a 0 rate for such a sales tax. The other issue I have with the prebate is that a fixed cash payment to every household to cover the cost of the tax for "needed items" will put people who live in high cost states at a disadvantage. It will result in those people getting less value for their prebate than people in low cost states. That's another thing that exempting certain items from tax does address.

50 posted on 03/17/2011 9:12:25 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102
That's another thing that exempting certain items from tax does address.

Please don't misunderstand me: I am not suggesting that sales tax OR the Fair Tax are without merits. I just would like to hear how sales-tax proponents adress the mother of them all --- the fact that poor people pay more of sales tax (in proportion) than wealthy ones. Aside from fairness, it is also a practical question: how can you expect to persuade people if you don't address their main concern?

52 posted on 03/17/2011 9:18:31 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson