Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
I don’t think Al-Waleed is the loyal nephew he pretends to be in the media. I think he’s on the side of the islamists.

If so, he's playing a dangerous game. If I recall correctly, two prominent 30-something members of the al-Saud clan who were suspected to be al Qaeda sympathizers died under mysterious circumstances after 9/11. The speculation is that the Saudis had them killed for helping bin Laden.

13 posted on 03/17/2011 8:15:34 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei
I can't help but wonder about Obama's pre-Harvard ties to the Prince's right-hand, al Mansour, and what kind of long-term investment Al Waleed might have in Obama. If he's the master and POTUS is doing his bidding, fomenting revolution and establishing a new empire is the Prince's objective. Because that's clearly what Obama is doing.

This interview with the Prince also raised my suspicions.
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=201103111609dowjonesdjonline000593&title=saudi-prince-alwaleed-day-of-rage-was-tempest-in-a-teacup
Especially the "We love the king" part.

I agree, if true, he's playing a dangerous game. But he does have more cover than other prominent royals do. Twenty billion dollars worth.

16 posted on 03/17/2011 8:34:04 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson