Two, right off the top:
"Al Qaida commander backs Libyan rebels in message"
http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=212003
"al Qaeda urges rebels to fight Gadaffi"
http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/NewsDetails.aspx? storyid=301798
The kind of appropriate action where we go after terrorists, was once referred to as the War on Terror. As I asked before, what happened to it?
One of those you seek to "exterminate" is a sovereign country. First, we're not going to "exterminate" them and you know that; second, attacking a sovereign country without a long-term strategy is what got us in trouble in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Three other matters I didn't bring up earlier:
1. Would you want to intervene with 0bama playing the role as commander-in-chief? Does anything about his performance give you confidence that he'd succeed in this endeavor?
2. Under which flag will our military fight? U.S., U.N., ??? Which way do you think "citizen of the world" 0bama will go on that one?
3. What happens when Libya devolves into a mish-mash of tribes tearing into each other as a result of our knocking off Gaddafi? Think we're not going to put boots on the ground?
It all sounds so cut and dried... until it starts.
I still maintain... spilling blood for muslims brings no benefit to the United States. They are not worthy of it, IMO. Let them destroy each other.
I seek to exterminate a country?? What are you talking about?
Since when is one who wants to exterminate a terrorist who murdered 189 American citizens, a person who wants to exterminate a country?