[heiss]

thisis from wikipedia

In February 2011, in the middle of a statewide debate regarding labor unions’ collective bargaining, Judge Sumi refused the Madison School District’s request to send teachers back to work. The district asked the judge to impose a temporary restraining order to bar teachers from participating in further work stoppages. It referred to the teachers’ protests in the capital as a strike, which are illegal under state law. The judge refused to categorize the work stoppage as a strike and said that the district could not prove irreparable harm had been caused by the teachers

[headstamp 2]

Union hack judge.

[Carry_Okie]

The judge refused to categorize the work stoppage as a strike and said that the district could not prove irreparable harm had been caused by the teachers.

Since when does harm have to be irreparable in order for the instigation to be actionable?

[manc]

she ruled that, WOW, so no harm was done by these teachers taking days off in here eyes.

Nothing like a far out biased judge who ignores the law.

So write another bill now and then vote it in again.

[newzjunkey]

Refusing to send the teachers back to work certainly makes it clear where the judge's loyalties lie. Are these cases not randomly assigned?

GOP may have screwed up with it's calendar shenanigans but they can pass it again and short circuit the judge shopping.

[1010RD]

So a neutral judge objectively interprets law...