Although the ‘what-if’s’ are necessary at this stage - 20 months prior to the 2012 presidential election - I find this a cogent analysis that is more realistic than most and factors in elements that most Palin pieces, even those with a positive spin, usually ignore. Refreshing.
I agree, it is a good approach. But the “what if Sarah beats Obama in a debate” ignores the fact that the media won’t LET her “win” the debate, even if she does. So I fail to see how the high negatives that the article acknowledges will be offset by a media-controlled debate.