Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California State GOP convention: Blowup, outgoing chair accused of "thuggery"
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 18 March 2011 | Carla Marinucci

Posted on 03/19/2011 12:39:03 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture

State GOP convention: Blowup, outgoing chair accused of "thuggery"

Republican State Sen. Sam Blaskeslee of San Luis Obispo, leading the charge against a conservative move to revise the party's endorsement of candidates, sharply criticized the outgoing GOP chair Saturday as a failed leader who has "resorted to thuggery."

Blakeslee made the comment after walking out of a heated meeting of the state GOP Rules Committee at the start of a 3-day day statewide Republican Convention which brought 1,000 delegates to the Sacramento Hyatt.

His comments come on the heels of efforts by outgoing GOP chair Ron Nehring, who has lead a charge of conservative activists wanting to change GOP bylaws; the shift would allow for state and local committee members of the party, typically conservative grassroots activists, to endorse choose to endorse one GOP candidate over another in a primary election -- a first in the party.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: abelmaldonado; blakeslee; cagop; cagopconvention; gopconvention; maldonado; maldonadolegacy; nehring; prop14; proposition14; ronnehring; samblakeslee; thuggery; toptwo
Blakeslee is one of the a handful of Republicans in play for the Democrats who could vote in favor of extending taxes. He is reported the only one of these potential turncoats who is at the CAGOP convention this weekend.

Nehring is the outgoing chairman of the pathetic CAGOP.

The issue is how to deal with the unfortunate passage of Proposition 14, which eliminated the traditional primaries in favor of the "top two" primary, with the top two vote-getters going head-to-head in the general election, which could see general elections between two people of the same party and the elimination of third-party alternatives.

A crowded Republican field makes the possibility of splitting votes and allowing the greater likelyhood of two Democrats running off in a general election.

The bad alternative I see in this food fight at the CAGOP convention is having a few party elites winnowing the Republican field and endorsing who they consider "electable."

1 posted on 03/19/2011 12:39:09 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

I am surprised there are any Republicans left.

Are any conservatives left?


2 posted on 03/19/2011 12:41:55 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

The top-two primary thing is probably the death knell of the CA GOP. It will become a real one-party state probably.


3 posted on 03/19/2011 12:44:24 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

All I can say is the last decade was a waste of time and a squndered opportunity for many here in California that still cling to the Republican liferaft known as the CaGop... as the creek is risin’.

between top two vote getter primaries , motor voter and Rinos,, we be skrewed.


4 posted on 03/19/2011 12:45:56 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Blakeslee doesn’t have much spine...pushes the enviro-agenda...


5 posted on 03/19/2011 12:46:04 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Here's the fight as outlined by L.A. GOP chair Jane Barnett:

"As you know the passage of Proposition 14 resulted in the abolition of the primary system to choose Republican nominees for federal and state offices. In order to preserve the Republican Party's right and ability to nominate candidates, last year the state committee adopted rules providing for a nominating system empowering county and state committee members to select Republican nominees in advance of what is now the general election in June.

Under that system the California Republican Party would have endorsed candidates in every district for the June general election and in November in every district where a Republican is in the runoff election.

Last month we began discussions about the process of amending these bylaws to improve and define the rules we adopted in 2010. For example, the current rules provide for a single, statewide nominating convention in Sacramento which is just not feasible.

There are competing Bylaw Proposals. Neither is perfect. But I believe we must start with the Nehring proposal.

I am proposing that caucuses occur locally in each county if more than one Republican files for office. I have over one million Republican voters in Los Angeles County. It is the duty of the elected members of the central committee to recruit candidates, register Republicans and get out the vote. With local caucuses we can hear the voice of the voters and choose our Republican nominees - a right Proposition 14 took away from us.

There is another proposal brought by legislators that would strip county central committee and state central committee members of the ability to select nominees. That proposal puts control over hundreds of races from Del Norte to Imperial Counties in the hands of the California Republican Party Board of Directors, if there is a compelling reason to endorse.

Republican county chairs should stand for local control. I firmly believe our elected legislators, are among the leaders of our party - but not the ONLY leaders. You and I represent the grassroots of our party as well as the elected central committee members and state committee members in our counties.

This weekend we have the opportunity to discuss both these measures in an open forum. Please join me at the Rules Committee meeting. And commit to working out a plan which gives a voice to our locally elected county central committees and preserves the values that have guided the Republican Party for generations.

Jane Barnett Chair, Republican Party of Los Angeles County

6 posted on 03/19/2011 12:46:41 PM PDT by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives"-Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

No wonder the Libs dominate Kookifornicata with the likes of inept Repubs like these conservatives don’t stand a chance. Only thing can change it if the state dumps in the sewer and lots of eyes finally get opened. When they beg the conservatives to take the lead then maybe it can be saved.


7 posted on 03/19/2011 12:51:53 PM PDT by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

...and that SEIU handles the ballots.


8 posted on 03/19/2011 12:53:14 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
There is another proposal brought by legislators that would strip county central committee and state central committee members of the ability to select nominees. That proposal puts control over hundreds of races from Del Norte to Imperial Counties in the hands of the California Republican Party Board of Directors, if there is a compelling reason to endorse.

Ahhhh, the coronation method.

This is the dream system for those jerks and why they didn't lift a finger to defeat Prop 14.

Screw 'em. I'm no longer a Republican.

9 posted on 03/19/2011 2:24:24 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Sapere Aude!" --Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“The top-two primary thing is probably the death knell of the CA GOP. It will become a real one-party state probably.”

Possibily - its how Louisiana operated for decades.

The only thing to save the party is a ‘party endorsement’ strategy. if they dont have that, they have nothing. the party dies.


10 posted on 03/19/2011 3:58:05 PM PDT by WOSG (Carpe Diem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I'm no longer a Republican.

Madam, from my viewpoint, you've not been a partisan for a long while.

11 posted on 03/19/2011 7:36:37 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

You’re right — good point. But I did have some hope that some in the party would actually follow the platform (which I mostly agreed with).
Unfortunately, adherence to the platform (or majority thereof) is not a prerequisite to wearing the “R” label.
After looking at the lineup on the ballot in 2008, and given Prop 14, I see no reason to maintain membership in the CRP.


12 posted on 03/19/2011 10:50:19 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Sapere Aude!" --Immanuel Kant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
The "top two" primary will do no good.

Most districts are Democrat strongholds, the choices in the general could easily be two Dems. Would that be a "moderating" influence? I don't see how. They're already winning as extremists, what would change?

I never cared who the party anointed. If I looked at any one organization's endorsements it was the CRA.

13 posted on 03/20/2011 4:12:35 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Obama: nobel peace prize winner, warmonger, golfer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson