Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Oh, he has?

0bangbang brought a handful of partisan hacks to the WH for 90 minutes and then announced his "plan," such as it is, before any of them said a word about it. That is not Congressional participation.

From the War Powers Act of 1973

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

Those are conditions that must be met before taking action. The War Powers Act stipulates that as well.

The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances,...

19 posted on 03/22/2011 12:13:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

From the Washington Post. An article with the text of the letter Obama sent yesterday to the Congress. I think it satisfies the requirement of the War Powers Act. It doesn’t satisfy me and certainly doesn’t satisfy the Constitution.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/obama_explains_libya_mission_to_congress/2011/03/03/ABU9377_blog.html?wprss=plum-line


20 posted on 03/22/2011 12:18:33 PM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson