To: AdmSmith
Since Miller and Urey's experiment was utterly discredited as an origin-of-life scenario, the scientists have now backed off and want to use it as a scenario for the origin of proteins/amino acids. Fine, but it does not solve the REAL problem in origin of life: Where did the information contained in DNA and RNA come from?
8 posted on
03/23/2011 4:56:38 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
To: backwoods-engineer
Fine, but it does not solve the REAL problem in origin of life: Where did the information contained in DNA and RNA come from? It's pretty much the same all over. Look at metallurgy. Sure, they've figured out some interesting stuff, but it basically just worthless crap, because it doesn't tell us where the metal came from.
To: backwoods-engineer
Information Science has proven that any information must come from a source with more information.
25 posted on
03/24/2011 5:37:35 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson