Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
The practical reality is that private (or public) parking lot bans on firearms in personal vehicles effectively limits firearms to the home (unless the landlord bars firearms).

Besides ,the "legal" status is that only a very tiny number of people in the U.S. actually have absolute property rights through land grants;the rest of "private property" is rented from the government.Think not?Then don't pay your property taxes and see how long it remains "your" property.

If you as a private or public property owner or agency wish to ban firearms then YOU should be held fully and personally liable for any injury suffered by any person unable to defend theirself on your property,or who was unable to defend theirself while enroute to or from your property from their home.

I want a list of the other constitutional and natural rights you think property owners should be able to ignore at will.(REALLY want to hear how you plan to deny homosexuals,handicapped,blacks, or Democrats from your place in light of current law!)

42 posted on 03/23/2011 7:17:33 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: hoosierham
"If you as a private or public property owner or agency wish to ban firearms then YOU should be held fully and personally liable for any injury suffered by any person unable to defend theirself on your property,or who was unable to defend theirself while enroute to or from your property from their home."

That is nonsense. But if that's what you want than to be consistent a gun owner should be guilty of murder if they allow someone to steal their gun and kill someone else.

45 posted on 03/23/2011 7:21:46 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: hoosierham
Lets not leave out the regulations against smoking outside the building...The anti-smoking nazi's made it possible to restrict just about anything you want from your property...some business's (I know of one personally) can refuse to hire anyone that smokes even in their own homes and on their own time....Non-smokers only need apply...the excuse for needing such a requirement is the increase in cost of insurance to the company if anyone smokes in the company....There are anti-smokers who hail such a law.

Personal freedom is unheard of by these people

Followed by no smoking any place such as in NY via Mayor Bloombergs facist order.

Little bits here and there is always a restriction on personal liberty..

91 posted on 03/24/2011 4:22:56 AM PDT by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson