Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kodak Is Suing RIM And Apple For $1 Billion (patent infringement)
Business Insider ^ | 25 March 2011 | Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry

Posted on 03/25/2011 9:10:30 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi

Kodak is suing RIM and Apple to get royalty payments relating to patents, and a decision should come down today, Bloomberg says. Kodak's CEO has said that he expects to get licensing payments totaling $1 billion.

A Kodak VP writes us: "the U.S. International Trade Commission is expected to announce whether it will review an initial determination from an ITC judge which suggested that Apple’s iPhone and RIM’s BlackBerry don’t infringe Kodak’s patent. If the ITC's full Commission decides to review the earlier ruling, then another process would begin at the ITC, in which the full Commission will ultimately decide if that initial determination stands."

Kodak has a patent on image preview software in camera phones and is demanding royalties from RIM and Apple. Kodak already won royalties worth $550 and $414 million from Samsung and LG respectively.

It's easy to see this as an example of the patent system run amok. It's hard to imagine why "image preview in camera phones" is something that should be patented and that someone could get a license from. As Bloomberg notes, Kodak's actual business is faltering and the company is increasingly turning to this kind of litigious behavior to pad its bottomline.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: apple; kodak; patent; rim
Kodak already won similar lawsuits against Nokia, Samsung and LG.

Interesting...

1 posted on 03/25/2011 9:10:33 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

"One billion dollars."

2 posted on 03/25/2011 9:21:18 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

"One billion dollars."

3 posted on 03/25/2011 9:23:20 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I have just patented ‘taking pictures using devices with lenses and films’.

Kodak will now pay me!


4 posted on 03/25/2011 9:29:49 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Of course, this is not nearly as good as the patent on ‘selling goods for money’. That one is really big.


5 posted on 03/25/2011 9:30:45 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Interesting... I didn’t hit “post” twice...


6 posted on 03/25/2011 9:36:40 AM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

“Interesting... I didn’t hit “post” twice...”

It’s a software glitch somewhere. It’s been happening on almost every thread since the servers went down several months ago.


7 posted on 03/25/2011 10:07:20 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

RIM job?


8 posted on 03/25/2011 10:08:03 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
It's hard to imagine why "image preview in camera phones" is something that should be patented and that someone could get a license from. As Bloomberg notes, Kodak's actual business is faltering and the company is increasingly turning to this kind of litigious behavior to pad its bottomline.

Kodak is a big company in a mid-size town. An old company. Its management grew old, protectionist -- that was back in the 80's and 90's. They weren't willing to promote the risk-taking. Very much like the Detroit car-makers, and even worse. The photo film business was Kodak.

The motive of punishing the inventive continues. As does the abuse of the very IDEALS of what *US* patents are about -- encouraging INVENTION and INNOVATION. Today the patent industry is like what was LEFT BEHIND IN ENGLAND. Punish all risktakers, destroy all innovation and protect the established.

9 posted on 03/25/2011 10:15:06 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Kodak is on its last legs. Anytime it is able to sell off a business unit for an even remotely good deal, it will. Of course these are the business units that are the more successful ones in the company because they are the only ones that are worth anything.

In 1982 Kodak employed 60,000 people in the Rochester area. Today that number is 7,000. Kodak really isn’t a big company anymore. If it still exists in 5 years I will be surprised.


10 posted on 03/25/2011 10:25:17 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Kodak had big plans to be the leader in digital imaging, a strategy developing products to be ready when the culture switched. They missed it by five years.


11 posted on 03/25/2011 11:06:41 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GnL

I hadn’t realized how much they have downsized. In any case the weak close to death get taken over by bad spirits unless surrounded by a caring family and community. That applies to people and enterprises both.


12 posted on 03/25/2011 12:29:41 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

And in other news, Kitchenaid is suing Oster for their “Food Preview” technology. Essentially, Kitchenaid made their blender using glass and could see the contents of the food, whereby Oster then used glass, violating Kitchenaid’s patent.

In other wrods, how the Hell is a preview of an image a patent in the first palce???


13 posted on 03/25/2011 12:32:33 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson