Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unseen1
she unlike Obama called for it for one reason and one reason only to kill the American murderer. the two policies could not be more different

If the end result of either Palin's or Obama's position puts Al Qaeda in charge, what difference will it make why they held the position?

67 posted on 03/26/2011 1:43:59 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: mountainbunny
If the end result of either Palin's or Obama's position puts Al Qaeda in charge, what difference will it make why they held the position?

Seems like Obama's position is to leave Gaddafi in charge. He waited until the rebels were pushed back by Gaddafi forces, and he refuses to strike Gaddafi's compound.

As far as Palin goes, if you can document Al Qaeda's involvement then you may have a point, although even in that case, I don't think she would leave them "in charge".

74 posted on 03/26/2011 1:56:38 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson