Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Of Sweatshops And Classrooms ^ | March 27, 2011 | David Stokes

Posted on 03/27/2011 5:35:01 AM PDT by Kaslin

On March 25, 1911—exactly 100 years ago—approximately 500 workers were crafting “shirtwaists,” blouses with puffy sleeves and tight waists. These garments were the height of feminine fashion in America during the years before World War I and worn by “Gibson Girls.” It was part of an image personifying beauty, with a touch of independence, popularized by illustrated stories developed by a guy named—yep, you guessed it—Charles Dana Gibson.

But the women and girls (primarily) working long hours to produce the “shirtwaists” were not likely to actually wear them. They were immigrants for the most part, underpaid and overworked. They labored on the Lower East Side of New York City in a sweatshop at 29 Washington Place—specifically on floors seven through ten. On that particular Saturday they were wrapping up their otherwise typical workweek of many more than 55 hours or so, when a small fire started in a scrap bin. One sad hour later, glowing embers bore witness to an event of unspeakable horror. Sirens wailed throughout the city and hundreds of people made their way toward the scene of billowing smoke, “arriving in time to see tangles of bodies, some trailing flames, tumbling from the ninth-floor windows,” as described in the 2003 bestseller by David Von Drehle, Triangle—The Fire That Changed America.

It was a moment as pivotal as it was tragic.

The death toll reached 146, most of them women between the ages of sixteen and twenty-five. They died from burns, asphyxiation, trauma from a fall, or combinations thereof. In the aftermath of the Triangle fire, the movement toward trade unionism accelerated. Various governmental entities investigated and acted on issues such as low wages, the use of child labor, and employee safety. Eventually, several dozen laws and ordinances were enacted or enhanced, permanently changing the American workplace.

And, yes, part of the equation was the development of a strong labor movement in the country. In fact, standing in the crowd watching events unfold on that fateful day 100 years ago was a young lady named Frances Perkins, who would later serve as President Franklin Roosevelt’s Labor Secretary (the first woman in a presidential cabinet). She was famous for her observation that the Triangle fire was “the day the New Deal began.”

Few Americans today, no matter the political posture or affiliation, would seriously challenge the idea that things as they were in sweatshops in 1911 needed to change. And the next year, 1912, when the Titanic sunk, things changed to make sure ships had more lifeboats. Tragedies have often been the catalyst for constructive change and this has a way of honoring the memory of the fallen.

But the idea that somehow the current labor unrest among public workers in places like Wisconsin somehow relates to what happened 100 years ago in New York City is not only a stretch, it’s a, pardon the term, complete fabrication. If history is to be used to inform modernity, at least let’s make it honest and applicable. To compare, as some have done and are doing, the plight of workers in the garment district in 1911 with the issues du jour facing public workers is beyond ludicrous. And it brings to mind Talleyrand’s words, “it’s worse than a crime; it’s a blunder.”

Are the classrooms of America akin to “sweatshops” of old (or in many countries today)? Do schoolteachers and other public employees face the same dehumanizing conditions as immigrant workers before World War I? Do the deaths of 20 workers on an inadequate and overburdened fire escape in 1911 compare to the “plight” of public school teachers in Wisconsin who receive over $50,000 in annual salary, full medical coverage, and ten weeks off in the summer?

Recently, I was in Europe and tried to change a flight to come home a day early and the airline wouldn’t work with me on it. I was not happy. Then I turned on the hotel television and watched scenes from the Tokyo airport. It put my “unhappiness” into perspective. I used to complain that I had no shoes until I met a man who had no feet.

Yes, American workers—private and public—owe a debt of gratitude to people who fought valiantly generations ago. We also owe honor to so many whose lives were sacrificed on altars of human greed and indifference. But the surest way to dishonor those who fought and died for a better standard of life today is to somehow think that our battles today are on par with theirs.

Not in the same league, frankly. Not even close.

What we have in the current public employee brouhaha is an argument on behalf of unionism for the sake of perpetuating unionism—all done in the education field, of course, in the name of the children. But even that rings hollow when considered in light of what the patron saint of public employee unions had to say. His name was Albert Shanker (1928-1997--former president of American Federation of Teachers) and he was famous for the line, “When school children start paying union dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of school children.”

His spirit seems to be alive and well across the board in the public employee labor movement.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: goonions; goonionthugs

1 posted on 03/27/2011 5:35:06 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So well articulated...thanks for posting.

2 posted on 03/27/2011 5:38:16 AM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Are the classrooms of America akin to “sweatshops” of old ...

Sure. Students are forced to be there. They're subject to abuse from management and other workers, with little or no recourse. The more intelligent and diligent are forced into additional work aiding the slower students. Their conversations and private writing or pictures are monitored for adherence to management's rules.

3 posted on 03/27/2011 5:38:19 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Nadie me ama como Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Excellent reminder

4 posted on 03/27/2011 5:39:21 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The compassionate liberals made a wonderful world where caring people no longer buy their fancy clothes made in sweatshops in the Lower East Side, or North Philadelphia, or Lowell, Massachusetts.

These caring compassionate people -- and the rest of us for that matter -- buy their fancy clothes made in sweatshops in China and Southeast Asia.

The Democrat Party -- making the rich feel righteous for two generations.

5 posted on 03/27/2011 5:52:48 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“underpaid and overworked” In a free society? Curious.

6 posted on 03/27/2011 5:53:10 AM PDT by Doctor 2Brains (If the government were Paris Hilton, it could not score a free drink in a bar full of lonely sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
They're subject to abuse from management and other workers,..

And....When a child ( whose only crime was being born) **rationally** rebels against being treated like a prisoner in prison-like buildings, and being subjected to the abuse that breeds in prison culture, he is hunted down by armed police, hauled into court, and subjected to ankle bracelets and/or to a stay in “hard-time” prison.

While both children in schools and prisoners in hard-time prisons both have their First Amendment Rights trashed, real prisoners do have it somewhat better.

1) Real prisoners are not subjected to non-stop godless Marxist indoctrination.

2) Real prisoners are more likely to be less segregated by economic class and race.

7 posted on 03/27/2011 7:01:30 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doctor 2Brains
They were immigrants for the most part, underpaid and overworked. They pilfered so much from their employer that the company had to lock the exits.
8 posted on 03/27/2011 9:04:43 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hello, 27 Washington Place is in Greenwich Village, nowhere near the lower east side. Really.

9 posted on 03/27/2011 9:13:13 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My mother was a nyc school teacher and she hated the union and Shankar. But she also endured a dangerous environment full of abuse and violence. The schools were no day at the beach.

10 posted on 03/27/2011 9:18:58 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo

I have no idea, I have never been to NY city, but I am sure you meant 29 Washington Place

11 posted on 03/27/2011 9:29:20 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Washington Pl is on Washington Sq in Greenwich Village, which is on the west side.

12 posted on 03/27/2011 12:51:09 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin


13 posted on 03/27/2011 8:11:44 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson