[algernonpj]

... I'll bet he'd respond to me if I wanted to purchase a newsletter that confirmed my fixed point of view on the subject, however...

Another graduate from Alinksky's school of sly character asasination who changes the original subject, the impact on the CPI of using soft metrics such as hedonics and the substitution effect which are subject to corruption by the power that be du jour.

[Toddsterpatriot]

the original subject, the impact on the CPI of using soft metrics such as hedonics and the substitution effect which are subject to corruption by the power that be du jour.

If only someone would do the calculations the old way, without using soft metrics such as hedonics and the substitution effect.

Do you know anyone who does that? Me neither.

[Mase]

LOL!

You and Williams know more about "the impact on the CPI of using soft metrics such as hedonics and the substitution effect which are subject to corruption by the power that be du jour" than the entire bond market combined.

Uh, huh. Sure.

You believe Shadowstats because you want to believe Shadowstats, not because of anything factual or because you possess an understanding of the marketplace or how these calculations are determined. Debating people with a fixed mentality is a waste of time. This is just more proof.