Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judges uphold California's offshore ship emissions rules
Sacramento Bee ^ | 3/29/11 | Denny Walsh

Posted on 03/29/2011 8:19:46 AM PDT by SmithL

The merchant shipping industry has failed a second time to short-circuit California's effort to combat the toll on the health of its population from air pollution caused by oceangoing vessels.

The industry is contesting California's authority to regulate fuel used by seagoing vessels up to 24 miles off its coast.

The Air Resources Board estimates the vessels' emissions of particulate matter cause 300 premature deaths across the state every year.

California mandates that ships "use cleaner marine fuels in diesel and diesel-electric engines, main propulsion engines, and auxiliary boilers" while operating far beyond the traditional three-mile jurisdictional limit. The Pacific Merchant Shipping Association, in a lawsuit closely watched by states on both coasts, argues that federal statutes and the U.S. Constitution preempt those state rules.

The association asked U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. to summarily invalidate the rules adopted by the ARB in 2009.

England refused, and the association took its case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. On Monday, a three-judge appellate panel upheld England and sent the case back to Sacramento for trial.

In their 45-page opinion, the judges acknowledged as unusual both California's Vessel Fuel Rules and the environmental problems they are intended to address.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; 9thcircus; arb; awallacetashima; barrygsilverman; carb; goldenstate; morrisoncengland; pollution; puntacolonet; robertecowen; shipping; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: rockinqsranch

Yep! That is the plan. And the sheep are going along with it. I don’t understand it, but, I suppose I don’t have to.


21 posted on 03/29/2011 9:09:40 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Kalifornistan brings its troubles on itself. I was out there a couple of years ago at the ano neuvo elephant seal rookery. The guide mentioned that a rich person had sailed his sailboat too close and gotten stuck on the rocks. At that point one of the couples in the tour cheered - presumable solely because someone rich had problems. I somewhat loudly mumbled “what a pair of asshole losers.” But I got the wifely elbow and was unable to continue my thought outloud. I noticed the same couple leaving in a several year old toyota with california plates. so they were natives.


22 posted on 03/29/2011 9:19:36 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This and the longshoreman are the reason the Mexicans are building a deep water port in Punta Colonet, Mexico.

http://seaport.homestead.com/files/colonet.html


23 posted on 03/29/2011 9:24:53 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Where is our military?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

I am pretty sure that once the shipping stopped,SOMEBODY out there would see the error of their ways.


24 posted on 03/29/2011 1:16:15 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson