Replies

Government personnel who would seek to illegitimately disarm free persons, or penalize them for refusal to disarm, shall be regarded as robbers; free persons have a right and duty to treat them as such.

I was mulling that over today, how could a form of penalty assessment be included and remain legal. Tie it to the States. I.E. generate a statement to be included in the Amendment along the lines of your thoughts and let it be determined by the same range of penalty in that State the offence occurred in. That would be determined by the residence of the Complainant, not the defendant.

Also, the penalty should not be any less than if the Complainant had been injured or killed as a result of the infringement of their Second Amendment right. This would apply whether or not the Complainant got so much as a scratch. Minimum, voluntary manslaughter.

If the Complainant actually did incur bodily harm? Whoooo buddy! Maximum? Same as Attempted Murder.

Around here azzholes like Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. REED, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. KERRY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. BOXER, and Mr. WYDEN could wind up in prison for a very long time.

A TEXAS prison...

And if it was proven the Complainant dies due to not being able to defend themselves adequately in the face of an attack because they could not be legally armed at the time of the attack, Capital Murder and that could include Death Row.