To: elpadre
Obviously, you didn't read it completely. There already was a very strong revenue sharing program in place that funded Alaska since 1976. (The Permanent Fund) This program was already paying over 75% of Alaska's operating costs, paying a dividend to every resident of over $1,000 per person every year. It also eliminated the need for a personal income tax.
Palin’s additional tax, basically a Windfall tax, caused the Oil companies to stop producing and drilling new exploratory wells because they would have difficulty making a profit from increases in the price. The result was a production loss of about 40% which also decreased Alaska's overall gains in revenues. The article explains this thoroughly.
52 posted on
03/30/2011 7:58:09 AM PDT by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
"Palins additional tax, basically a Windfall tax, caused the Oil companies to stop producing and drilling new exploratory wells because they would have difficulty making a profit from increases in the price. The result was a production loss of about 40% which also decreased Alaska's overall gains in revenues."
______________
Not true. Federal restrictions have led to the decrease in production and exploration in Alaska, not state taxes:
U.S. Government Shuts Out Increased Alaskan Oil Production Oil
Lowering taxes didn't increase oil output
75 posted on
03/30/2011 10:48:01 AM PDT by
Josh Painter
("The only thing these 'investments' will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy." - Palin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson