Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elpadre
Obviously, you didn't read it completely. There already was a very strong revenue sharing program in place that funded Alaska since 1976. (The Permanent Fund) This program was already paying over 75% of Alaska's operating costs, paying a dividend to every resident of over $1,000 per person every year. It also eliminated the need for a personal income tax.

Palin’s additional tax, basically a Windfall tax, caused the Oil companies to stop producing and drilling new exploratory wells because they would have difficulty making a profit from increases in the price. The result was a production loss of about 40% which also decreased Alaska's overall gains in revenues. The article explains this thoroughly.

52 posted on 03/30/2011 7:58:09 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP
"Palin’s additional tax, basically a Windfall tax, caused the Oil companies to stop producing and drilling new exploratory wells because they would have difficulty making a profit from increases in the price. The result was a production loss of about 40% which also decreased Alaska's overall gains in revenues."

______________

Not true. Federal restrictions have led to the decrease in production and exploration in Alaska, not state taxes:

U.S. Government Shuts Out Increased Alaskan Oil Production Oil

Lowering taxes didn't increase oil output

75 posted on 03/30/2011 10:48:01 AM PDT by Josh Painter ("The only thing these 'investments' will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy." - Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson