To: AmericanInTokyo
You might as well say, “Cheer up, we only lost the northern third of Japan.” In other words, granting that the radioactive contamination is limited, how extensive is it, exactly?
12 posted on
03/31/2011 12:48:21 AM PDT by
dr_lew
To: dr_lew
I dont know. Ask CNN. That is the kind of headline they would run.
14 posted on
03/31/2011 1:27:25 AM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(NEVER seen such irresponsible, panic-driven, ratings-designed reports as on CNN/Fox, etc. re: Japan)
To: dr_lew
The jet stream shows the steam, water vapor, dust and particulates heading from Fukishima Japan and mostly traveling north eastward and south eastward and landing in Canada, Alaska and the PAC NW US. Apparently, dilution is the solution for the radioactive crowd.
Weather Model - North Pacific Jet Stream Wind and 250 mb Pressure
To: dr_lew
"You might as well say, Cheer up, we only lost the northern third of Japan." Ye gods, man. Japan had two nuclear weapons detonated on its soil, eliminating two cities. Are those areas "lost" today??
Think!!! At least TRY to get some perspective on the issue.
To: dr_lew
Cheer up, we only lost the northern third of Japan.Two out of three ain't bad.
24 posted on
03/31/2011 8:50:25 AM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson