Nasty?? My, is that the best you can do? LOL!!
Your clap-trap General Armchair, tells me you’re the most foolish kind of hypocrite, without regard to the fact that we have troops fighting in that area. Bet you’d wave the 1st Amendment around for somebody who yelled FIRE in a crowded theater too.
And no, I still don’t give the preacher a pass. I suppose you condemn Petraeus’ opinion comments on this, “principled American” that you are.
I’m so damn glad he’s in charge of operations over there and not dingbats like you.
You want to know if “nasty” is the best i’ve got? How ‘bout the rest of the post Pharibreeze? Talk about “picking horsesh-t out of honey!”
I see you’ve had to whip up a batch of new bitches, because you have no answer for my last post.
Yeah, I can see Harry Truman calling his generals on the carpet for using the term “Japs,” now. Besides, what do you care about troops in the area? I thought you were wetting yourself over innocent UN personnel?
Oh well, when you’re getting your rhetorical butt kicked...change the subject, I guess.
And what do you think our troops are there for but to preserve our way of life? Cart home all that Afghan treasure?
When you get to the point you have to start bleating petulant little girl whines like “I bet you’d...,” it’s way past time to either concede and shut up, or move to France.
Personally, I have no concern over your craven cowardice. There have always been craven cowards, and there will always be craven cowards. Furthermore, I know no craven coward is EVER going to willingly admit he’s a craven coward, no matter how conclusively that craven cowardice is demonstrated. It’s your blaming it on Christianity that offends me of your very existence.
I could even respect you if you put forth a stern critique of the minister’s demonstration for nothing but utilitarian reasons. But for you to superciliously condemn him for nothing more than not going along with your “emperor’s new clothes” rationalization of why we should do what the muslims tell us, proves to me beyond any shadow of doubt that a general’s ability to play chess with “real pieces” says absolutely nothing about his ownership of “a pair.”