Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STE=Q

Just have a minor problem with the author’s depiction of imperialism in Africa. The era of European colonialism was Africa’s period of greatest prosperity, growth, improvement in infrastructure, and stability. It wasn’t exactly a redistribution of wealth thing.


3 posted on 04/02/2011 5:56:38 PM PDT by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ophiucus; stylecouncilor; windcliff
This guy sees things a little differently
11 posted on 04/02/2011 6:10:44 PM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Ophiucus

That is because you and I know that wealth is not the pie, it is the bakery. Leftists don’t get that.


15 posted on 04/02/2011 6:16:06 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Ophiucus

Absolutely. The author implies that Britain came into a peaceful and wealthy area of Africa, which they later made into Nigeria, stole all their “stuff” and created ethnic conflict.

In actual fact, of course, the area was incredibly poor and racked by warfare long before Europeans showed up. There just wasn’t much of anything to steal. Colonialism was at best a break-even proposition for the imperial power. Most lost a great deal of money. Imperialism was not engaged in for profit and loss reasons.


20 posted on 04/02/2011 6:52:17 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson