Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
The story is accurate if each rat can hit his target.

In real war it has never proven to be the case. All wars has always won by quality of troops and equipment over sheer numbers. You can take this back to as far back into time as you like and it still holds true.

29 posted on 04/04/2011 4:22:01 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Steve Van Doorn

I only need to take it back to Korea. The Chinese would have won, and should have won, except for the “Korean haemorrhagic fever” (hantavirus) epidemic, that lethally decimated the Chinese side, and incapacitated far more.

As I said, it is a balance.


31 posted on 04/04/2011 4:41:27 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Steve Van Doorn; yefragetuwrabrumuy

I don’t entirely agree, Steve. WWII, Germany had some very high-quality equipment, particularly armor. The main method of defeating Panzers by both the Americans and Soviets was just to pour more of their own armor into fighting the German tanks than the Germans could handle.


42 posted on 04/05/2011 2:21:27 PM PDT by tarawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson