To: The Great RJ; blam; All
"I grew up in the 1950s when the US was still doing atmospheric nuclear tests in Nevada..." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Excellent way to out this in perspective!
On Google Earth, go to "Sedan Crater, NV". Zoom out a bit, and pan southward down that valley until you reach the dry lake at the southern end.
Try to count all the craters in that valley. You can't -- there are too many... Here's a small sample:
Every one of those craters is the result of a nuclear (or thermonuclear) bomb explosion -- right here on the soil of the good ol' US of A.
If your "entire food supply" is not already "radioactively contaminated indefinitely" from all the radioactivity released from the Nevada Test Site, do you really think that a nuclear powerplant on the other side of the Pacific is going to do so?
55 posted on
04/05/2011 9:25:39 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: TXnMA; djf
57 posted on
04/05/2011 9:34:00 AM PDT by
blam
To: blam; All
It is probably a good bet that the routine hose-down of
one of these after a mission sometimes put more radioactive "nasties" down the storm drains than has been released from Daiichi into the atmosphere...
59 posted on
04/05/2011 10:37:05 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: blam; All
It is probably a good bet that the routine hose-down of
one of these after a mission sometimes put more radioactive "nasties" down the storm drains than has been released from Daiichi into the atmosphere...
60 posted on
04/05/2011 10:37:14 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: blam; All
It is probably a good bet that the routine hose-down of
one of these after a mission sometimes put more radioactive "nasties" down the storm drains than has been released from Daiichi into the atmosphere...
61 posted on
04/05/2011 10:37:33 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
