Libertarians lie and are not conservative. They are liberals who are merely cheap.
Ron Paul is insane.
Why?
Paul just doesn’t get the value of armed force. Reduce it arbitrarily, and you get unintended consequences. Such as Britain’s decision to reduce the size of then Royal Navy in 1922. That, as much as anything else, nearly cost them the war in 1940. But we seem to be doing the same thing now. China is moving into a vacuum.
Well, what is it in the statement that isn’t true? If they are correct in this instance, do think that any conservative ought to be breaking out the party hats to celebrate the Ryan proposal?
Really? So when did I lie? And exactly what is your conservative level, if this is a challenge, as a red blooded American conservative, bring it! (leave your emotions at home, and get ready for homework on American Political History, non-revised, all original source).
Fricn rats on the board
I am a conservative libertarian.
I don’t lie, and I’m not cheap.
Though, I do agree that Ron Paul is insane.
I don’t see any lies in this article. Republicans have been lying to conservatives for too long now and look where it has gotten the country. By sticking with Republicans no matter what, we have gotten ourselves the Rino party in power.
Trimming spending here and there is not going derail this monster Republicans and Democrats have created. There has to be a new scope of work set for the Federal government in line with it’s orginal constitutional purpose and power if we hope to get out from under the burden of this monster.
I agree with you that having libertarians driving the car of reform is dangerous and I propose that it is as dangerous as permitting Rinos to continue driving the car. Libertarians are amoral and mindless drunks in pursuit of an extra-constitutional ideology while the Rinos are following Soros’ mindless pursuit of social and economic international Marxism.