Skip to comments.Report: 500 Votes Found in Waukesha County Wisconsin
Posted on 04/06/2011 8:56:02 PM PDT by Nachum
Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, April 6, 2011, 9:58 PM
Developing- This comes from a trusted source in Wisconsin: Local precinct officials have reportedly found 500 votes in Waukesha County Wisconsin. Officials believe they have found 500 ballots in a county that voted 73% for Prosser.
Far left contender Joanne Kloppenburg currently leads the race by 204 votes over Justice David Prosser.
(Excerpt) Read more at gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com ...
Here we go again!
If they break the way the rest of the county voted that would mean a net gain of 230 for Prosser.
Don’t hold your breath on this story, unless you’re already in the terminal stages of COPD or senile dementia.
It’s taking a while, but we’re learning. Always hold back a fraud-prevention reserve.
next they’ll find 5,000 more in the trunk of a car rented to Richard Trumpka in a Madistan parking lot.
JJC! Why can’t the precinct officials keep track of ALL the ballots? This happens somewhere during every election. It’s beyond asinine.
The United States of America! - The Planet’s Largest Banana Republic.
It is time we had private contractors handle elections. We trust our CPA's with our money, so why can't they handle the voting process.
Ah the delicious scent of irony!
“It’s not who votes...it’s who counts the votes...” ...Stalin
Maybe we are learning.
In other words it is just some unsubstantiated rumor...
I predict the liberal judge will win in the end.
There will be a recount and reviews and canvassing and all that, but, in the end, there will be undiscovered votes, or the recount totals will increase for the liberal. And that will put her over the top. That’s just how these things work, sadly.
This will be routine in close, hotly contested elections with operatives who believe they can acheive political goals via weak election procedures.
The "found" ballots might either be fabricated and introduced into the mix for the desired result, or be ballots believed to be in the opponent's favor that were "inadvertently stored in the wrong closet" - as may be the case here.
The sensible thing will be to produce serialized copies with strict depositing controls. There would be no ballots to be later found.
We shouldn’t get our hopes up. The fix is in, and it comes all the way from the top. The. Very. Top.
You may be right...but with recounts, chaos, lawsuits & appeals she might not be seated until 2012.
“...next theyll find 5,000 more in the trunk of a car rented to Richard Trumpka in a Madistan parking lot.”
THAT is very likely. The dems are nothing but pros when it comes to voter fraud, and even more so, with the unions being the center of this election.
A discrepancy was discovered in vote totals from a community in Waukesha county. More votes were cast for the school board race than the state supreme court one. Now local precinct workers are claiming theyve found 500-600 ballots which would explain this discrepancy. This community voted 70% for Justice Prosser. Officials are confirming if these lost ballots are valid. These ballots could give Prosser a majority.
However, this all may be a technical error. The village and town both voted for the school board candidate and thus, votes may have simply been double counted.
Investigation is under way.
My source is a State Senator and high ranking GOP official.
Ill keep you updated.
A republican and a Democrat representative, approved by each party, should be handcuffed together at each polling place. They should each accompany every ballot cast in their voting place to the place where they will be counted. After recieving a receipt for those ballots, the people receiving them, also handcuffed to a person of the opposite party, should then deliver them to a secure room where they would be tabulated......by a group of equally divided approved counters. Perhaps they could come up with at least a reasonable total....
If voter fraud could be fixed, we would not be having budget showdowns.
from fleebaggers to congress.
Has the DNC sent any of the Chicago Daley crime family to take charge of the recount effort yet?
Even if the ballots put Prosser in the lead, there will still be a recount.
Granted, I’d prefer Prosser go in to the recount with a lead instead of Klopditz.
Yeah. This story was floated earlier today . A head fake .
So they will feel even more justified, cheating and committing fraud.
CPAs f*ck up all the time.
Arthur Andersen for one.
The CPA’s handling the books at Koss, for another.
LOL! Hey Laz,
Yeah, we’ve made the left mad, we should really be shaking in our boots now!
Please explain what you mean by “serialized copies with strict depositing controls”. That term is not one I’m familiar with.
Thanks in advance.
What you wanta’ bet they all voted in alphabetical order like they did for LBJ for senate.
why cant (arent} WE doing that...Why do we always have to be the party of nice..Boehner gets some balls...You will never get another chance in your life to stand up to a president..wow cry over THAT power from your little town in OOhio and MAN UP
Found? Did they lose them?
Yes, but they do it for the children, old people and sacred teachers. (/sarcasm)
If I were a very cagey, clever communist, I’d plant my votes for the communist in a precinct that voted heavily for Walker. That way, the Prosser campaign would be the one insisting the votes be counted...
It seems that would put Prosser up by 26 votes. But, in the spirit of Al Franken and union vote counting there will be boxes of ballots yet to be found that will strangely be almost all democrat votes.
It is about time our side started finding votes!
Any time an election is this close, the leftist wins.
RS can youn imagine being a little puke from Ohio who could go up to the (COUGH) leader of the free world, a smaller puke than he, and not...Boenher is a big disappointment. He talks big but carrys hairbrush
They must of outsourced their vote counting to the Washington state election committee.
If ROTUS is sporting a metaphorical wig, as Trump seems to think he is, then Boenher’s hairbrush might be the best tool; not that I think Boenher will expose the Won. But I do think Boenher just might shut ‘er down, or get much of his cuts. Debt ceiling looms ... that’s the biggest play to be seen, shutdown or no. I guess we’ll see who cries last.
Never give up!
Yea, they accidentally dropped the box of ballots that was duck-taped to their butt when they were crawling on all fours in the attic behind the chimney while on a break from pole watching on election day.
No real reason to be up there, whomever's turn it was to have a box of ballots duck taped to their butt just happened to get a hankering to crawl on all fours in the attic behind the chimney while on a break from pole watching on election day.
What luck for them that someone else just happened to get a hankering to crawl on all fours in the attic behind the chimney!
How in the hell do you "loose" five HUNDRED ballots?
I'm not all that familiar with it either. It was off the top of my head and its been a long day.
Essentially, I think the computer method is fraught with risk. Driving home from a recent election I worked out a scheme which I thought at the time was bullet-proof. You know how those "great ideas" sound initially.
As I recall, when the voter was determined to be entitled to vote, the voter would be given a serialized paper ballot and the serial # would be checked off on a separate list - the # would not be recorded with the voter's name.
The ballot would consist of a top original with a second copy that was a faithful reproduction of the voter's markings on the top form; i.e., a state of the art carbon copy, etc. Both forms would bear the same serial #. The voter would place the voter's choice of either in one of two unmarked boxes that were on two unmarked tables that were monitored by two unmarked individuals - who were appointed by the two major parties (there would be no need for other tables for other parties).
Such a procedure would seem to ensure a reliable counting, auditing and reconciliation process.
terycarl's variation of that scheme sounds good but it could raise issues when the monitors had to take a potty break.
I’m kind of jumping in here, but I have one major concern with giving voters copies of their completed ballots: it undermines the principle of secret ballot voting. Anyone wanting to buy votes could make payment conditional on receiving the voter’s copy of the ballot with the correct names marked.
That said, it could be accomplished in much the same way by having the voter shoot a photo of their completed ballot in the booth.
Just a thought.