Replies

Is this the eligibility bill that requires the long-form to be shown and the candidate to prove they are a “natural born citizen”? There was one AZ bill that would actually work AGAINST the NBC issue, by saying that only one parent had to be a US citizen. Or maybe that was the bill that was about anchor babies.

Do you know if Seel is up on the issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility and the whole NBC issue?

One of the things that Trump (and everybody) needs to know is that the HDOH appears to be manipulating records, and there is a little girl who was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day whose name is in the HDOH’s birth and death index for 1960-64 - and yet the HDOH claims to not have any birth record for her. This little girl’s BC# could well be the one that shows on the Factcheck COLB, and by juggling BC#’s around, the HDOH could give that number - that place in the computer system that would have the right dates - to Obama, in order to try to make a place for a forged long-form to show up and appear to have been entered into the system legitimately, etc.

The way that would be recognized is by seeing what changes have been made to that record. If the records were manipulated there would be a computer transaction showing that she changed names to Obama’s. If Soros et al know that nobody will ever see those transaction logs, they would be emboldened to do exactly that kind of thing. If they know that they would get caught if they did such a thing, they would hopefully be deterred from doing it.

So one of the things that is absolutely critical is for SOMEBODY to pass a measure that gives legal standing for somebody to challenge eligibility and get discovery of those logs/records which would show the veracity of the documentation.

And just to be absolutely clear, I say that because the foundations for the HDOH to be able to do that kind of record manipulation with this little girl have already been laid. There is good evidence of other records manipulation by the HDOH as well, which I won’t go into until I’ve got the proof absolutely pinned down. Ladysforest has pointed out that the 1960-64 birth index doesn’t have a heading saying the date range. And Obama’s name seems to be right in the spot where the original (non-duplicate) record for Mae Obado should be. Can’t prove what’s up with that, but it definitely deserves an explanation.

So this is not just overactive imagination dreaming up problems where there are none; this is a response to records manipulation we’ve ALREADY seen and manipulation that we may well be seeing IN PROCESS. They have already claimed that a little girl whose number may be the one on the Factcheck COLB is not in their system with a birth record, when their very own birth index list says that she is. So we’ve got evidence of general manipulation as well as evidence of manipulation of records that could SPECIFICALLY be used to insert a forged Obama long-form.

Both Seel and Trump need to know that.

Cheerio, if Seel is en route to NYC right now I don’t know if there’s a way to contact him, but is that something that you would be able to check into?