To: Bigtigermike
Why in the world would you think the House would get 100% of what they wanted? Purist thinking will never work.
$80 B out of $ 100 cuts on what was a DEM budget is pretty darn good IMO.
To: Siena Dreaming
The Dems didn’t have a budget, they punted to the Republicans. This IS a Republican budget, the biggest spending budget ever passed by any Congress.
34 posted on
04/08/2011 10:47:27 PM PDT by
runninglips
(Republicans = 99 lb weaklings of politics.)
To: Siena Dreaming
101 posted on
04/09/2011 1:56:53 AM PDT by
linn37
To: Siena Dreaming
That is an $80 B cut ONLY using Democrat math. I.e. it is an $80 billion cut from PROPOSED spending. It actually only cut less than half that.
Less than half, and justification using Democrat math is “As good as we could get”?
106 posted on
04/09/2011 2:46:15 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: Siena Dreaming
Let's start playing in the real world. I am not going to go after my own team. They have made good progress--we live on to continue the fight. Just a few minutes ago, FOX reported more progress that was made that had not been reported before. We are not going to get all we want right off the bat.
Let's get real folks, the RATS still control the Senate and Obama has the WH.
We are going in the right direction and I am grateful for that.
To: Siena Dreaming
Boner is in the Rove wing of the Whig Party. I fully expect them to trot out Jeb Bush for the next election.
To: Siena Dreaming
Exactly.
Amazing cuts when faced with obama and the democratically controlled senate.
More to follow, as the rats folded much, much more than the republicans did.
164 posted on
04/09/2011 7:56:46 AM PDT by
Hulka
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson