Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
Cutting entitlement programs IS NOT an event of default!

I agree.

Congress has no legal obligation to keep the benefit forumals unchanged!

Or to pay any benefits at all.

28 posted on 04/11/2011 9:53:45 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
Or to pay any benefits at all.

True, but I think you would agree that completely eliminating benefits wouldn't be wise or politically feasible. Thankfully, it's not necessary to stay solvent. The sooner we start modifying the benefit forumlas, the less abrupt and less painful the necessary cuts will be.

I'm pretty optimistic that a hybrid combining elements of Ryan's plan and the deficit commission's plan will eventually pass. Politicians on both sides are beginning to realize it must, and at the end of the day, it can be sold to the public. Underneath it all, the case is just not that hard to explain: the money to pay the promised benefits is simply not there, no matter how high you raise taxes on the rich.

While the urgency of changing our entitlement state cannot be overstated, I think the difficulty of the task is being overstated.

33 posted on 04/11/2011 10:31:41 AM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson