Principal Elsa Carmona said her intention is to protect students from their own unhealthful food choices.
What is the nutritional value of an uneaten lunch?
Nutritional value has nothing to do with it. It’s the people getting paid to supply the lunches that are gaining the value. Someone is getting a kick back.
Great. Government protecting us from ourselves.
Well that explains the Enchilada’s on the menu. What are the odds the Gubermint folks, and Schools officials are getting kickbacks from the food providers....nah...not in Chicago.
So now we know how some of the students in her school pass to upper grades without real qualifications: the school must be answering their multiple choice test questions for them to protect them from getting the wrong answers.
Cradle to grave control.
I guess students in her school are just too dumb and ignorant to survive without such assistance.
The MONEY quote is that the school makes money by kickbacks to the meal provider and all the transport, supply and delivery of the meals. That’s how they justify raising taxes. The POOR children can’t “afford” breakfast, lunch and in some cases dinner provided by the government for the little future parasites to look to momma government from cradle to grave care.
Pathetic