Posted on 04/11/2011 8:16:09 AM PDT by IbJensen
The president is going to have to make some policy decisions pretty soon. About foreign and national security policy. They will take the form of personnel changes at the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Department of Defense, but since personnel=policy, the new (or reshuffled) lineup will perhaps tell us if Mr. Obama has actually learned anything about the way the world works and Americas role in it.
Since his public statements can be used to prove most anything you wish hes been on virtually all sides of many crucial issues the personnel moves will likely be enlightening, or at least helpful to those trying to figure him out.
Gates is retiring soon, sometime this summer. So thats one open slot. And Mullen, the current chairman of the JCS is term-limited and must leave in September. So that makes two. If you believe the Washington insiders, you will bet that Leon Panetta, the current CIA director, will move to the Pentagon, that General David Petraeus, the current commander of the Afghanistan war effort, will replace Panetta in Langley, and that General Hoss Cartiright, Mullens deputy at the moment, will move up one rung.
The Cartright move is the least likely, in part because there is considerable opposition within the top military ranks. Moreover, the JCS job is apparently Petraeuss for the asking. Hes certainly qualified, and although, Washington being what it is and human nature being what IT is, there are those who are less than unqualified admirers, no one will mount a campaign against him. As against that, Petraeus doesnt have a warm cuddly relationship with the president and with Thomas Donilon, the powerful national security adviser, while Cartright apparently does.
Indeed, one of the insiders favorite subplots is that Obama fears Petraeus as a political rival, whether within the system or as a Republican presidential candidate next year. If he were at JCS, the general would have a very visible podium, but if he were at CIA hed have to be quiet. So it would make political sense for the president to send Petraeus to Langley and reward his buddy Cartright with the chairmans seat at JCS. Furthermore, the loyal Panetta would ensure that the chiefs sing from the Obama hymnal.
If you were Petraeus, what would you do? I cant answer that question, since I dont know if he wants to run for public office. Hes certainly a very political animal, and a master of public relations. Does he fancy a run for the White House or some other such job? If so, hed be ill-advised to go to the CIA, where Panetta has done a splendid job protecting Obamas back from the sort of murderous assaults that the spooks unleashed against W. He hasnt turned the Agency into a first-class organization, but I dont think anyone can do that. You can find folks close to Petraeus who believe that he might make the CIA much better, and that he might take the job because its so important for the future of the country. If true, and if he goes to Langley, I would expect Petraeus to have a very difficult and unpleasant tenure. Those guys might not know what theyre supposed to about Iran, Syria and Libya, but they know a great deal about Washington, and they have lots of willing co-conspirators in the media.
How would Panetta do at DoD? Hes very close to Obama which would give him at least as much leverage over policy as the cautious Gates has had but he doesnt seem to be a particularly vigorous policy advocate. So what would the leverage be used for? The most likely answer is that it would be used in reverse, in a campaign to cut the defense budget and weaken the services. Good for Obama, bad for the country, you might say. But hes the president, and hes going to head in that direction, and I would expect him to want his guy to manage it.
If Petraeus, acting out of character, says its either JCS or hell consider his options as a private citizen, Obama might have to find a different CIA director, and hed likely want someone in the Panetta mold: a loyal pol. And thats easy, those people are all over Washington, and lots of them would love to be head of CIA, even in its diminished status under the thumb of the director of national intelligence.
What does all this tell us about policy? What we knew in the first place: that there isnt anything approaching a coherent policy in this administration, and so Obama is likely to look for a War Cabinet whose members will do his bidding, whatever that might be. Theres not a single name on the list that is associated with a definable global vision, even if you expand the list to include the likes of Senator Reed, or General Odierno. Its all about himself, about his reelection campaign, and thus about tactical decisions with no strategic goals aside from looking cool.
Yes, they are talented men. They do their jobs well. But were at war and Obama isnt very comfortable around warriors. Which is why he seemingly wants Petraeus in internal exile. I dont know if hes right about that, its what comes out of this little world inside the Beltway, and most of the time that stuff is wrong.
So well get a bit of change, but it doesnt look like were going to get reason for hope that were going to take the war seriously.
A government shut down would have been interesting and should have been decisive. Had Obama insisted on including pay for the military, Gates and all the Joint Chiefs along with Petreous really were obliged ethically to resign, given that the CinC was given an option to exclude the military. Senior appointments are entirely political, but hopefully most of them took their leadership ethics with them.
you can count on obama doing what is worst for the USA. therefore, watch Obozo move Eric Holder from DoJ to CIA.
“...You can count on obama doing what is worst for the USA. therefore, watch Obozo move Eric Holder from DoJ to CIA.”
:::::::::::::
So very true. The ignorant and self-serving electorate along with a majority of the complicit Congress, have allowed this situation to rise and perpetuate. Where will America end up next? Who will be the rider of the White Horse that will clean out the White House and its anti-American ilk? Perplexed and frustrated.....
you can count on obama doing what is worst for the USA
Of course.
Or Axlerod or Ayres to CIA for the same purpose.
Or Axlerod or Ayres to CIA for the same purpose.
Just the idea of this man as commander in chief may cripple the opposition as they laugh. Too bad so few of them have a sense of humor.
And conservatives won't object..indeed..they'll be thrilled:
1. It gets Graham out of the Senate.
2. He'll be far better than anyone that Obama might name..remember...Clinton gave us Les Aspin
3. Gov. Nikki Haley gets to name the next senator from SC..
While Bozo is at it he could do us all a favor and gurney Lugar out of the Senate, shove a rod through his spine and make him Hitlery’s replacement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.