Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
There are many publications by Gofman - here’s another titled Radiation-Induced Cancer From Low-Dose Exposure

John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. 1990 http://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RIC/contentsF.html


And now, thirty years later some of the most advanced, cutting edge cancer treatments involve low dose exposure.
108 posted on 04/14/2011 4:26:58 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

The 20 years that expired since the interviews have not changed the fact that radiation damages cellular genetic material and can lead to cancer and other health problems. This is why, since x-rays were introduced into medicine, that the ‘safe’ dosage, which assumes an increase in cancer risk, is lowered over the years, why the technician gets behind shielding for x-rays, mammograms etc. This is why there is controversy over the use of mammography because the screening technique uses radiation which introduces a cancer risk but not screening may allow a tumor to grow undetected. The known properties of radiation have not changed - the way it’s used has changed. Medicine is currently using targeted doses to turn the cellular destructive force of radiation on tumor cells. But there is an acknowledged risk - it’s an attempt at balancing the risks.


110 posted on 04/14/2011 11:37:46 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson