Skip to comments.O’Reilly Shamelessly Lies To Cover Obama’s Origins – Fox News Scrubs Its Site
Posted on 04/15/2011 12:27:10 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
The once-vaunted Fox News network has joined the rest of the liberal, establishment media in providing cover and concealment for the origins of Barack Obama. This morning on Peter Boyles’ Denver KHOW talk-radio show, Washington Times columnist Jeff Kuhner spoke about the “birther” story and its widely-known (and feared) underground status within the nation’s capital. Boyles has been a hound on the trail of the cover-up for the past three years. Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, not to mention Glenn Beck and contributor Ann Coulter, long ago jumped into the Orwellian chorus of them who will not see what is directly in front of their faces.
Boyles says that Fox has now gone to the astonishing length of scrubbing its website of O’Reilly’s blatant lying two nights ago, during his “talking points” segment, when he claimed that Obama’s possession of a Connecticut Social Security number is perfectly legitimate because Barack Obama, Sr. lived in that state when he was a student at Harvard University. It is a demonstrably impossible scenario. The e-mails that came in from incredulous Fox News viewers who caught on in a heartbeat to O’Reilly’s mendacity have also been removed from the web and from the site. The material has vanished down the Orwellian memory hole. Laura Ingraham is currently sitting in as the show’s substitute host.
You can listen to the Kuhner interview here – scroll down and click on the7:00 a.m.link:
The Democrats must continue trying to stifle the story because, if the truth comes out that the President was not Constitutionally eligible to run for his office, it will cause long-term devastation to the leftist political agenda and to its very foundational party structure. The Democrats staked their entire future on this man-without-a-history, who has broken nearly every promise he made during his 2008 campaign.
The mainstream good-ol’-boy Republicans are turning a blind eye because they believe that it’s a losing political argument. There is no principle within the strategy. It is completely politically shaped and it is without a shred of courage or ethics. They are, not to make a pun here, abjectly ignoring the biggest elephant that has ever walked into the nation’s living room – a President who has a sufficiently dark secret within his history that he is willing to spend millions of dollars in legal fees to keep it from becoming public knowledge. And the Fox News network is now complicit in the dodging of the question: Who is Barack Hussein Obama and from whence came he?
The result of all of this, whether attributable to O’Reilly’s blind ambitions to continue grabbing Presidential interviews or to the influence of the Saudi Arabian News-Corp buy-in with Rupert Murdoch, is that Bill O’Reilly and Fox have become what he once told us is bad – a mendacious blow-hard television pseudo-reporter who does no more than to run interference for the radical left’s destructive political agenda.
Same here fox is just like cnn but they lie about being fair and balanced... to which they are neither... they are full blown left playing a game with the stupid American public. They think that we are all morons.
Wow insane political advice from a party whose Presidential candidate can’t even win dog catcher..
Remember William Colby, CIA Dir. 73-76 saying the CIA controls all important news media. See infowars.com/bombshell-barack-obama-conclusively-outed-as-CIA-creation/ An article by Wayne Madsen.
This nation has been sold out.
You have to wonder if Bill the EgO didn’t take a few days off ‘cause he couldn’t take the heat.
>>I do not watch FOX any more. I get most my news from the web now.<<
Me too, since I became a member here in 1998.
I googled it and it comes right up. Video and transcript. IIRC it was not during the Talking Points, but during the Mail segment BoR mentioned the Conn SS number.
"We get a ton of internet propaganda here. Nearly every day, some hysterical dispatch shows up on my desk saying the world will end on Friday or Moluccan terrorists have just infiltrated through Brownsville, Texas, and are heading for your house.
But no one is more popular on the net propaganda circuit than President Obama. So in the interest of no spin, it is my pleasure to set the record straight.
Mr. Obama is a controversial guy. All presidents are. But he does deserve to be treated honestly, does he not? So here we go.
Item: The president has not released his academic transcripts.
True. His records from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School have not been made public, and the president could do that if he wanted to.
Item: His thesis from Columbia has not been made public.
False. He didn't do a thesis. You may remember that Hillary Clinton kept her Wellesley thesis private until somebody outed the paper on radical Saul Alinsky.
Item: Mr. Obama has not released his medical records.
True. His doctor says he's in good health and has put that in writing. You may remember that President Clinton would not release his health care records. Bush the younger released evaluations but not official records.
Item: President Obama has not released his law practice client list.
True. But I don't know many lawyers who would, citing the privacy of clients.
Item: No birth certificate has been made public.
True. But the state of Hawaii has, once again, said Mr. Obama's birth certificate is on file. A certificate of live birth has been released. A "Factor" investigation also showed Mr. Obama was born in a Honolulu hospital and we stand by our reporting.
Item: There is no record of baptism.
True. No such document is in the public domain.
Item: Michelle Obama lost her law license.
False. She currently has an inactive law license.
Item: Mrs. Obama has more assistants than other first ladies.
False. She has about the same number Laura Bush had, approximately 20.
Item: Barack Obama received foreign student aid while in college.
False. Somebody just made that up.
So there you have it. Just the facts, Jack. "Talking Points" is glad to be of service.
And that's "The Memo."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/oreilly/transcript/bill-oreilly-separating-fact-myth-regarding-president-obama#ixzz1JcgdwH2c "
>>Swift Boat Veterans come to mind.<<
Yep. That was where I lost respect for him as a non-biased commenter as well as a conservative. He isn’t. He’s about being “centrist” at all costs.
>>How come you post every day against FOX and never against CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN ...?<<
I would wager a guess it is because we already agree where the others stand.
I would rather watch Cupcake Wars then BOR....
Found the audio clip where Boyles dissects the O’Reilly litany of Obama excuses—If you don’t want to listen to the whole shebang, start listening around the 2:20 mark:
Can’t even stand O’Reilly’s voice as he introduces the segment—”separating fact from mythhh”. Yeah right. What a blowhard! O’Reilly has a vested interest
in now poo-pooing any facts that come out about Obama’s records. He has long been on record as stating this is a bunch of hogwash and he and others are going to have a lot of egg on their face if the truth comes out.
The last one O’Reilly spouts about was about Obama receiving foreign aid to go to school.
Savage had him pegged for a long time.
Does anyone remember a story from Canada about a memo that was sent out to news org’s not to make waves for BO regarding the BC issue?
Was this it?:
Media Blackout on Obama eligibility dates back to November:
What’s most funny about that is that O’Reilly is like 6’8”.
Birthers are kooks.. Anyone who believes something that was started by a 9/11 truther is a kook.
Obi and his buddies have obviously made a political, cynical calculation: releasing information will be more harmful than not. Obi calculates that this issue will be linked to folks not favored by independents.
As a serious question: what could Hawai’i release that would not be challenged as fraudulent? Isn’t anything digital suspicious?