The good people of AZ have been played. The statute about to be signed reads as though it was drafted by someone who plans to present evidence of a home birth:
…IF THE CANDIDATE DOES NOT POSSESS A LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE …TWO OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS SHALL TAKE THE PLACE OF THE LONG FORM…[a] CIRCUMCISION CERTIFICATE… [a] POSTPARTUM MEDICAL RECORD FOR THE…CHILD SIGNED BY THE…MIDWIFE OR THE PERSON WHO...EXAMINED THE CHILD AFTER BIRTH.
It appears specific language regarding parents was removed by amendment prior to passage.
If the “BC” which Obama said he found, is an HI document that reflects a home birth, and such a birth is said to be the source of his “embarrassment”, it will cause him to be warmly embraced by any number of fence-sitting voters, almost as though he was a homeless orphan.
God have mercy on our nation if all the other states use similar language.
Can it be changed or amended?