This guy kind of conflates two mostly-unrelated issues here. On the one hand, yes, we probably need to make Europe get off it’s collective (collectivist?) butt and start investing in their own armed forced, but on the other hand, it’s really boorish of the Zer0 to start a fight and then push it off on other countries just because it’s politically inconvenient to him. I realize this is ostensibly being done under the auspices of the UN, and the other countries did (sort of) join with us voluntarily, but at the same time, I’m sure they did so only because we were along for the ride, and absent us they would have done something else.
No, you don't get it.
Obama engineered this a) to set a precedent of UN/international commanders bossing US assets, b) to set another precedent of UN intervention in a country's internal affairs (see: Israel, also U.S.A. and "Aztlan"), and c) to corroborate the International Left's formulary, which they've been pushing at the UN, of a "duty to protect", viz., the UN barging into a country to "protect" some "civilians" (like Hamas, like MeCha, like LaRaza, like Hizbollah) from a big, bad oppressor (like Israel, like the U.S.A.).
Obozo's screwing with us and setting up a) the overrunning of Israel and a new Holocaust, and b) the partition and destruction of the United States by enemy Great Powers under UN auspices (how about a Chinese "mandate" west of the Rockies, to "protect" ethnic Asians and Mexicans? -- like that idea?).