Posted on 04/19/2011 12:31:08 PM PDT by library user
There are things happening that are escaping the bounds of any human control.
I hoped to never live to this point.
Now here, I hope to live to see the hand of God act.
There will be no questions then.
All will be... displeased.
the puppets decide . . . at great cost to us all.
You have to look beyond whoever ‘wins’ or ‘loses’ in this particular case, and focus on the ‘precedent’ being set by the SCOTUS in deferring to the ‘experts’ of the EPA, saying that the courts do not have the necessary expertise in whatever the ‘science’ in question is being debated..................
What a pile of garbage.
Folks, take this as a positive: if the court is going to rule NO COURT can rule, then we have to change the legislative branch MASSIVELY, get them to REMOVE the EPA via law, then when the Marxists bring a lawsuit to reinstate the bureaucracy, use this case as precedent.
Mr. Restuccia should invest in a dictionary. That's not an adroit use of the word "enormity."
All of it - you're on a roll and you're right! Obama and the EPA, however, are green under the gills and insist on foisting their climate change tax scam upon us - doubtful they will cease the attempt anytime soon.
Sun isn't shining for Solar stocks
Are Solar companies starting to sour on China?
Italy to slash solar subsidies
I know that but that isn’t what this case is about.
Who do you think should win this one?
It’s a tough call.
States with their hands out on one side and power companies on the other.
Either way, the people lose.............
“The only solution is to now restrict the powers of the EPA via legislation.
With the current regime in place that is a long way off”
At least until the next election.
Roberts appears to question EPA's side, so I'll wait for the verdict.
They all have the same masters..
Huh?
The Court telling people that we have to hold Congress responsible for things they pass, and you complain about it?
In so many words they also proclaim that the only way to curtail the EPA is legislatively and the only way to stop the EPA is to do away with the EPA.
Congress must act.
The US Supreme Court is selected by the dumbass presidents, who are elected by dumbass voters, then they are affirmed by the dumbass congressmen, also selected by the dumbass voters.
No matter how you approach the mess, the buck stops with the voters of this nation.
Now these same justices say the EPA folks are “experts”? Well, which is it, boys? Are the EPA “experts” or are the SCOTUS justices “experts”? It cannot be both. To say both is like saying your wife is only half pregnant.
The time has come for states to tell SCOTUS and the EPA they have NO intention of obeying any kind of crap that flows down from either. For that matter, the states should tell FedGov to pound sand with all their rules, regulations, and garbage. Further, the states stop sending tax monies to DC or take any filthy money from DC.
“Now if ya can find 50 people willing you will be lucky.”
I know of two. Where are the other forty-eight?
Actually, no... in this case the Ginsberg is ruling against courts limiting greenhouse gasses, albeit merely to protect a bad reason. Ginsberg is saying, “Look, you already won having the EPA regulate green house gas. Now, you want every judge in America to ALSO have the right to regulate green house gas. Sorry, no dice. “
END THE EPA NOW.
They admitted they do not even consider jobs in their wrecking ball agneda.
Congress created this monster NOW they need to kill it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.