Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court indicates it will dismiss 6-state global warming lawsuit
LA Times ^ | April 20, 2011 | By David G. Savage, Washington Bureau

Posted on 04/20/2011 11:30:47 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

The Supreme Court signaled Tuesday that it would throw out a global warming lawsuit brought by California and five other states that seek limits on carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants in the South and Midwest.

Encouraged by the solicitor general, the justices said regulating greenhouse gases should be left to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The issue debated before the high court Tuesday was not whether greenhouse gases are causing global climate change, but who should regulate them. The decision involves politics, economics and science, the lawyers said.

"It's a question of tradeoffs," said Peter Keisler, representing the power producers. "There is no legal principle here to guide the decision" if it were made by a judge.

Keisler was joined by acting Solicitor Gen. Neal Katyal in urging the justices to throw out the lawsuit against the power plants as too sprawling.

"In the 222 years that this court has been sitting, it has never heard a case with so many potential perpetrators and so many potential victims," Katyal began. Everyone on the planet emits carbon dioxide, and everyone is a potential victim of global warming. Judges and courts are not suited to handling global problems through a lawsuit, he said.

In their comments and questions, it became clear that the justices — liberals and conservatives alike — were dubious of allowing a single judge to decide on the regulation of greenhouse gases.

This "just sounds to me like what the EPA does," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told a New York state lawyer who was defending the lawsuit. A judge cannot be "a super EPA" who sets and enforces detailed regulations, she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; carbon; co2; cooling; energy; epa; greenhouse; lawsuit; scotus; warming

1 posted on 04/20/2011 11:30:49 AM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

“...regulating greenhouse gases should be left to the Environmental Protection Agency...”

Ya, and DEFINING “greenhouse gases” should be left to real science!

NOT agenda driven crapola!


2 posted on 04/20/2011 11:37:22 AM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
“...regulating greenhouse gases should be left to the Environmental Protection Agency...”

Bull.

3 posted on 04/20/2011 11:50:42 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Ping.


4 posted on 04/20/2011 12:08:21 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
"There is no legal principle here to guide the decision"

I know this may be asking the impossible, but how about just good common sense as a guied?

5 posted on 04/20/2011 12:12:44 PM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin

I’m surprised Ginsberg can still spell EPA.


6 posted on 04/20/2011 12:18:01 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Thunder90; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; Normandy; FreedomPoster; Para-Ord.45; ...
Thanx for the ping Army Air Corps !

 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

7 posted on 04/20/2011 12:24:49 PM PDT by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
I believe it would be more helpful to the Republic if all coal, oil and nuclear generation methods were outlawed and immediately ordered to cease action. This is just playing kick the can. Such action would obviously require a military presence.

We need to sit in the dark for a while with an armed NG force on the street to reconsider our priorities in some places.

Think of the savings after a hundred million or such oldsters die off trying to run their ventilators or recharge their batteries on their electric wheelchairs.

8 posted on 04/21/2011 12:37:56 PM PDT by mmercier (thrown into the mix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson