Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: technonerd; xzins; P-Marlowe; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; scripter; trisham; metmom; central_va; ...
This is a rather ominious analysis from the social-conservative viewpoint.

So, you joined FR last week to try to get us to drop social conservatism? Or is technonerd not your first FR name?

The question is: where to go from here?

For actual conservatives, the answer to that will ALWAYS be to continue to advance conservatism.

The best obtainable solution is probably to sidestep the problem by separating marriage and state.

Are you a retread, or did you simply join to promote sodomy? Marriage is a solemn union between ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN, anything else is a satanic abomination.

Perhaps you should read this:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!


44 posted on 04/22/2011 5:30:52 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
the answer to that will ALWAYS be to continue to advance conservatism

That's what I said -- advance conservatism; get the government out of its entanglements with everything under the sun.

48 posted on 04/22/2011 6:41:39 AM PDT by technonerd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson