Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace
However, the constitution DOES say who is responsible for proving qualifications

But you aren't going to cite it are you. LOL
149 posted on 04/21/2011 11:57:40 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

I will, as soon as you admit you don’t know where it is. I asked you the question first.


153 posted on 04/21/2011 12:38:45 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

On 2nd thought, I realize you’re never going to admit you don’t know, so I will tell you.

It’s in Amendment 20, Section 3.

http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am20.html

The answer is: It’s the responsibility of the President-elect to prove his/her qualifications. So, it really is Obama who needed to prove that he is qualified to be president. Not “the party doing the nominating” of him.


155 posted on 04/21/2011 12:46:12 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson